|
Signing of the landmine treaty: The United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution in 1996 calling for
vigorous pursuit of negotiations on a ban treaty "as soon as possible."
By the end of 1999-FEB, 134 nations had signed the treaty. This includes most of the
countries of the world, including Canada, France, Germany, Nicaragua, South Africa, the
United Kingdom, and Vatican City. The few nations that have not signed the treaty include
China, Iran, South Korea, Pakistan, Turkey, the United States and Yugoslavia. All of the
countries in NATO except for the U.S. and Turkey have signed the treaty. 67 nations had
ratified the treaty by 1999-FEB-28.
Implementation of the landmine treaty:The Ottawa Mine Ban Treaty came into effect throughout most of the world on 1999-MAR-1. The biggest bell-ringing event in history occurred at noon on that day, as churches around the world ring their bells. 2 Churches in Brazil, France, Italy, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom had agreed to celebrate. The International Campaign to Ban LandMines brought on-line churches from other countries. Rebecca Larson, secretary for research and development education at the Lutheran World Federation's (LWF) headquarters in Geneva, commented on 1999-FEB-17: "There's a very active campaign in the U.S., and on March 1 there will be pressure on President [Bill] Clinton for the US to sign...Throughout the past five years there has been a significant spiritual element in the campaign, and at the intergovernmental meetings regarding the treaty there has been ecumenical and interfaith prayer for the ban on land-mines, for the de-miners, and for the victims and survivors of land-mines." Over 1,000 non-governmental organizations have formed the International Campaign. More than a third of these are faith groups.
U.S. reluctance to sign:landmines currently provide the only feasible way of preventing passage through the buffer zone that separates North and South Korea. President Clinton believes that it would be irresponsible of him to sign the treaty at this time. He has suggested the date of 2006. By that time, alternatice weapon systems should have been developed. President Clinton's proposed goal of the year 2006 is conditional on the development of a substitute defensive system. In them meantime, the Pentagon is seeking nearly $50 million from Congress in 1999 to develop a new landmine system called RADAM. Stephen Goose, Program Director for the Arms Division of Human Rights Watch commented: "The goal of 2006 is already unconscionably distant...RADAM is the latest of a growing number of indicators that the Pentagon is not serious about the 2006 deadline, and that it is very unlikely to be met." On 2001-DEC-3, the fourth anniversary of the opening for signature of the Mine Ban Treaty, Human Rights Watch issued a press release which revealed that "45 percent of the 1.2 million long-lasting "dumb" (non-self-destructing) antipersonnel mines retained for use in Korea are stored at depots in the continental U.S. Another 50 percent are in Korea, but at the onset of conflict will be handed over to South Korean troops for their use. The U.S. earmarks only the remaining 5 percent of the mines for immediate use by U.S. troops in South Korea." 4 Steve Goose, program director of Human Rights Watch's arms division commented: "This new information seriously calls into question the major rationale put forth by the Pentagon for not banning anti-personnel mines. The U.S. has repeatedly said that these mines are needed to stop a massive surprise attack by North Korea. Obviously, they are not needed for that if they are sitting in warehouses in the U.S." 4 Human Rights Watch has issued a Memorandum for U.S. Policymakers o Landmines, dated 2001-NOV. 5
References:
Copyright © 1998 to 2001 incl. by Ontario
Consultants on Religious Tolerance |
|