The Manhattan Declaration of 2009
More reactions to the Declaration

Sponsored link.

About the Manhattan Declaration:
A group of over 150 "Orthodox, Catholic, and Evangelical" Christian
leaders released their
Manhattan Declaration -- a call
for people to resist many changes to the culture. It advocates civil disobedience
as necessary to promote their
beliefs. 1,2
They stressed three items:
 | Preventing access to abortion. |
 | Preventing loving committed same-sex couples from marrying. |
 | Preserving religious freedom and freedom of conscience. |

This list of reactions is a continuation from a
previous essay

Reactions to the Declaration:
 | Bill Muehlenberg, a columnist for Christian Today - Australia wrote:
"On occasions in the recent past various church documents and pronouncements
have come forth. Some have been wishy-washy and less than biblical. Thus it is
good to find a document like this which is not fearful in tackling some of the
biggest threats to religious freedom in general and biblical Christianity in
particular."
"It deserves not only a wide hearing but solid backing and promotion. The
strong stance demonstrated and enunciated in this Declaration is to be
applauded and duplicated, if we are to have the sort of impact we need in an
increasingly dark and fragmented society."
1
|
 | Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for the
Separation of Church and State commented:
"This declaration is certain to be deeply divisive. These religious leaders
want to see their doctrines imposed by force of law, and that goes against
everything America stands for. The United States is an incredibly diverse
nation, and it would be a disaster if government started favoring one
religious perspective over others. ... I am optimistic that the people in the
pews will not heed their leaders? misguided call to action. Polls show that
most church-goers do not want to see their faith politicized. But I am also
well aware that religious leaders have vast lobbying power that cannot be
ignored." 2
|
 | An editorial by Truth Wins Out (TWO), a GLBT-positive group, stated:
"Truth Wins Out (TWO) condemned a theocratic anti-gay manifesto that seeks to
foist compulsory Christianity on the nation, at the expense of basic liberty,
pluralism and freedom. The so-called 'Manhattan Declaration' was signed by 145
fundamentalist, evangelical, Catholic and Orthodox Christian activists, who
claimed they were above the law and would refuse to obey state rules unless
they were in alignment with their sectarian church beliefs.
" 'This is a disturbing call for anarchy from a group of radical clerics
and activists who believe they don?t have play by the same rules as other
taxpaying Americans,' said Truth Wins Out?s Executive Director Wayne Besen.
'We call on all Americans who value a free society to stand up and reject
this theocratic and intolerant manifesto'."
" 'It is heartbreaking that these so-called Christians have elevated
bigotry to be the defining aspect of the religious experience,' said Rev. J.R.
Finney, pastor of Covenant Community Church in Birmingham, AL. 'These
churches are uniting by dividing this country and making a mockery of the
rule of law'." 3
|
 | Sharon Autenreith of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch criticized the declaration's selection of the three most
important issues listed above. She wrote:
"Really? The 'three most important issues'? That?s a bold statement.
And what are the issues that are drawing younger evangelicals attention,
anyway? ... get a group of young Christians talking about social issues and
you are also likely to hear about climate change and justice issues - human
trafficking, militarism, and especially global poverty. Let?s just focus on
that last one for the moment. Are the signatories of the Manhattan
Declaration confident that preventing civil society from recognizing same-sex
marriage is a more central issue for Christians than addressing poverty? Are
they serious? Let?s see ... in the parable of the sheep and the goats
4 Jesus separated the blessed from the cursed based on how they treated the
hungry and thirsty, the sick, the stranger, the naked and the prisoner. If
that?s not enough reason to prioritize serving those in need, consider that
James 1:27 says that 'Religion God your Father accepts as pure and faultless
is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep
oneself from being polluted by the world'."
"My point is not that the sanctity of life and same-sex marriage are non-issues
for the church. ... What bothers me is the implication in Colson?s remarks
that all Christians must have have identical political priorities. His
hierarchy seems to me to be less rooted in scripture than in the present
political climate. 5
|
 | David A. Catania (I), a member of Washington DC's city council, said,
"It's a shame they don't extend the same efforts to issues that really matter,
like health care and homelessness." 6
|
 | According to the On Faith section of the Washington Post: "Some
political activists said the declaration was evidence of evangelical leaders
trying to lure back Catholics who voted Democratic in 2006 and last year."
6
|
 | The Religious Institute issued the following press release:
Westport, CT, Nov. 23, 2009: "The Manhattan Declaration, endorsed by the most
conservative religious leaders in America's religious life, is once again a
political call against women?s moral agency and the rights of lesbian and gay
persons masquerading in religious language. These religious leaders would have
us believe that they will be forced to provide abortions or bless same sex
marriages against their religious principles. Nothing could be further from
the truth."
"Faith leaders across the political spectrum support religious freedom, the
right of each religion to determine its own rites and practices, as well as
freedom of the pulpit. Mainstream and progressive religious leaders differ
from conservatives in our belief that no single religious voice can speak for
all faith traditions on abortion or LGBT equality, nor should government take
sides on religious differences. We oppose any attempt to make specific
religious doctrine concerning the rights of women and LGBT persons the law for
all Americans."
"Ten years ago, a multifaith group of religious leaders issued the Religious
Declaration on Sexual Morality, Justice, and Healing, a 500-word call for
sexual justice that affirms full inclusion of women and LGBT persons and a
faith-based commitment to reproductive rights. Today, the Religious
Declaration has been endorsed by 3,300 religious leaders, including
denomination and seminary presidents, from more than 50 faith traditions. Its
positions on reproductive justice and LGBT equality reflect the majority
opinions of American citizens, faithful and secular alike. Neither the
Manhattan Declaration, nor the handful of Catholic bishops and evangelical
leaders who created it, speak for most Christians, much less people of other
faiths." 7
|

Our thoughts on the declaration: Bias alert!
We usually avoid drawing conclusions in matters where there is conflict and a
lack of consensus. However we would like to suggest two paths forward in this case:
In view of the massive positive achievements and the colossal abuses by
Christians down through history, we recommend that individual Christians:
- Study history. Realize that every moral advance in Christian countries was
both promoted and resisted by Christians who quoted liberally from the Bible,
obtained support for their position from church tradition, and promoted
themselves as moral Crusaders doing God's will.
- Assess very carefully the programs promoted by fundamentalist,
evangelical, mainline, liberal and progressive Christian groups on each topic,
including abortion access,
corporal punishment of children, HPV vaccine,
physician assisted suicide,
equal protections for transgender persons and transsexuals,
same-sex marriage, stem cell
research, youth sexuality, etc. Hopefully, you
will find this website helpful, because it is one of the few religious sites
on the Internet that presents both or all sides to each topic.
- Determine which programs you feel are on the side of history, promote human growth,
and make available justice & liberty for all. It is very important to realize
that both opposing Christian factions -- from the mid-19th century when the
main argument was over human slavery to the early 21st century when the main
arguments are over marriage equality and abortion access -- claimed that they
stood "... for the common good."
- Personally promote what you see as positive programs and oppose negative
programs. They might well want to assist the signers of the Manhattan
Declaration in some of their endeavors while resisting others with all
of your available energy.
Another consideration worth studying is whether the three issues selected by
the authors of the declaration are worth focusing energy on:
 | Trying to limiting access to abortion may not be an effective use of
effort. The average abortion in a nearby city costs on the order of U.S. $400.
The additional cost of flying to a liberal state or to Canada only slightly
increases this cost. In order to make abortions very difficult to obtain, it
would be necessary to criminalize abortions in every state in the U.S. and in
nearby countries. This simply is not going to happen.
|
 | Trying to prevent same-sex couples from marrying may also not be an
effective use of energy:
 | A significant majority of American adults now favor making civil unions
available for same-sex couples. |
 | A majority of young adults favor making marriage (SSM) available to
loving, committed same-sex couples. |
 | Only the elderly are opposed to SSM in large numbers. |
 | The number of states that provide SSM is increasing. |
 | SSM is available in to qualified visitors to, and residents of, Canada. |
 | The overall effect is that support for SSM is increasing. The defeats of
SSM referenda in California and Maine passed by only a few percent. The
overall trend is towards acceptance. |
 | Continued resistance against equal rights for lesbians, gays, bisexuals
and transsexuals (GLBT persons) will increasingly alienate evangelical
youth.
|
|
 | Loss of religious freedoms for religious conservatives is a largely
non-existent problem.
 | Hate crimes laws do not impact hate speech;
the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects a broad range of
religious speech, including hate speech. |
 | The widespread belief that a pastor could be charged with conspiracy if
a parishioner is motivated by a sermon to commit a hate-filled criminal act
is simply false. |
 | To our knowledge, no U.S. church has been prosecuted or even charged
after refusing to marry a couple for any reason. In the past, churches have
refused to marry interracial couples, interfaith couples, same-sex couples,
even couples where one spouse is disabled, without any problems. |
 | The National Organization for Marriage's fear-based
television ad of 2009-APR attempted to scrounge up cases where
conservative Christians felt that they lost their religious freedom. Their
arguments simply made no sense. |
|
On the other hand, there are lots of evils and injustices to be tackled that
would really improve people's quality of life:
 | Thousands of children are dying every day around the world because of
infections caused by lack of access to clean water. |
 | The abortion rate in the U.S. could be
significantly reduced by removing economic roadblocks that give women no
option other than abortion. |
 | The abortion rate could be further reduced to
a fraction of its current rate in the U.S. by adopting social and educational
policies in place in Europe. |
 | Poverty, even hunger, is a very serious problem, even in the world's
richest nation. |
 | Religious intolerance poses a major threat to
the survival of the human race to the end of this century. |
 | The implications of climate change are
overwhelming unless the world can reduce our greenhouse gas emissions. |
 | Eliminating corporal punishment of children as
a method of discipline would significantly lower the rate of adult alcoholism,
drug abuse, clinical depression and clinical anxiety. |
 | 40 to 50 thousand people die each year because of lack of health
insurance, according to a Harvard University study.
8 |
You might consider picking one of these problems
and volunteering your time to help out in some way.

References used:
The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above
essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.
-
Bill Muehlenberg, "The Manhattan Declaration," Christian Today - Australia,
2009-NOV-23, at:
http://au.christiantoday.com/
-
Americans United, " 'Manhattan Declaraton' aims to use gov't to impose
religion," Opposing Views, 2009-NOV-22, at:
http://www.opposingviews.com/
-
"TWO Declares ?Manhattan Declaration? is Bigoted, Lawless and a Danger to
American Values," Truth Wins Out, 2009-NOV-20, at:
http://www.truthwinsout.org/
-
From Matthew 25:31-46. It lists the specific criteria by which people's salvation
and eternal destiny will be determined.
-
Sharon Autenrieth, "The Manhattan Declaration: A Hierarchy of Issues for
Christians?," St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 2009-NOV-21, at:
http://www.stltoday.com/
-
Michelle Boorstein & Hamil R. Harris, "Christian leaders take issue with
laws," The Washington Post, 2009-NOV-21, at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
-
"Religious leaders call 'Call to Conscience' unjust," Religious Institute,
2009-NOV-23, at:
http://www.religiousinstitute.org/ This is a PDF file.
-
David Cecere, "New study finds 45,000 deaths annually linked to lack of health
coverage, Cambridge Health Alliance, 2009-SEP-17, at:
http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/

Site navigation:
Other paths too numerous to list

Copyright © 2009 by Ontario Consultants on
Religious Tolerance.
Originally written: 2009-NOV-22
Latest update: 2009-NOV-27
Author: B.A. Robinson

Sponsored link

|