Quantcast
 


Twitter icon


Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
-Christian definition
 -Shared beliefs
 -Handling change
 -Bible topics
 -Bible inerrancy
 -Bible harmony
 -Interpret the Bible
 -Persons
 -Beliefs & creeds
 -Da Vinci code
 -Revelation, 666
 -Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment

Same-sex marriage

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in the military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Sponsored links

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

Religious news and information sources

Menu

Misinformation, disinformation, exaggerations, lies,
darn lies, statistics, etc on the Internet related to
religion, morality, ethics, human sexuality, & culture.

Sponsored link.

Since the startup of this web site in 1995, we have been continually amazed at the level of bias, misinformation, confusing reporting, and disinformation being spread by some religious and secular news sources. This seems to have reached very high levels in late 2009 with the introduction of the federal hate-crimes legislation. An earlier hate-crimes law had protected people from violent crimes motivated by the perpetrator's hatred of their race, color, religion or national origin. The new bill was signed into law during 2009-OCT. It added four new protected classes: gender, disability, sexual orientation, and gender identity. Because "sexual orientation" includes homosexual orientation in addition to heterosexual and bisexual orientation, the bill ignited a firestorm of opposition from many religious and social conservatives. Even though the law protects everyone -- heterosexuals, bisexuals and homosexuals -- equally against hate-motivated crimes, it was viewed by many as a law that gives special privileges and protections to lesbians and gays.

As the major federal elections of 2012-NOV approached, misinformation and disinformation is again reaching new heights.

The good news is that these news sources rarely lie.

However, some sources can be seen to bend the truth. They may:

bullet

Provide only their own assessment of the topic while remaining silent about alternate views. For example, some websites teach that homosexuality is defined as a behavior that is chosen, abnormal, unnatural, changeable and intrinsically disordered. They ignore conclusions reached by all the major psychiatric, psychologist, counseling professional agencies, etc. that homosexuality is an orientation that is discovered, normal and natural for a minority of adults, fixed in adulthood, and not a disorder or mental illness. Without open dialogue, these two belief systems will continue to exist even though neither side may be totally correct.
 

bullet

Ignore contradictory evidence that shows their opinions to be false, or at least suspect. For example, some religious websites promote the belief that Post Abortion Syndrome (PAS) -- a major depression triggered in women who have ended a pregnancy with an abortion -- is a very common phenomenon. Again, mental health professional organizations have studied PAS and found that it is rare. One side is certainly wrong. Although there would seem to be an obligation on both sides to find out where the truth lies, again there does not seem to be any dialogue.
 

bullet

Emphasize part of the news, while simply not reporting other parts. One example is a TV ad prepared by the National Organization for Marriage (NOM). NOM is the main national group attempting to prevent loving committed same-sex couples from marrying. It included an actor saying: ""I am part of a New Jersey church group punished by the government because we cannot support same-sex marriage." The ad is referring to the Ocean Grove Boardwalk Pavilion who received state and federal funding on the basis that it would remain a "public accommodation" -- providing a location for marriage and civil union ceremonies for the entire public. NOM didn't mention that the owners of the pavilion -- a Methodist group -- had refused a lesbian couple permission to hold their civil union because of the owner's religious beliefs. This violated the agreement with the two levels of government, and the church group's tax exempt status was revoked. The solution in this case would be for a fact checking group to evaluate the accuracy of this and similar ads. It would have to have a conservative political and religious position in order to be accepted by religious and social conservatives.


bullet

Explain the news in a way that often leads a reader to assume that something happened other than what really occurred. For example, many web sites prominently display two large numbers: the number of abortions performed annually by Planned Parenthood and the total federal taxpayer dollars that went to Planned Parenthood each year. The two numbers are unrelated to each other because no federal funding goes to perform abortions. But visitors were expected to jump to the incorrect conclusion that all the federal money went to fund Planned Parenthood's abortion program which totals about 3% of the services that they make available. Again, the solution would be for a conservative fact checking group to evaluate these web sites.
 

bullet

Reporting information from other news source's without prior fact checking. For example, an evangelical Christian author who believes in a young earth misunderstood the nature of the "leap second" -- a timekeeping adjustment that adjusts for the continual deceleration of the earth's rotation. His invalid calculations indicated that if the earth coalesced 4.5 billion years ago as estimated by many different scientific methods, it would have been rotating so fast back then that it would have flattened like a pancake. In spite many scientific websites that pointed out the error in the author's calculations, the "pancake theory" was picked up by many religious information sources as proof of a young earth. We attempted to dialogue with many of these creationist web sites to remove the error, but were unable to convince any of them to correct their web sites. A conservative fact checking group would at least highlight information sources that replicate errors.

It is our hope that people visiting this site will become more skeptical after reading some of the ways in which religious media inject bias into their coverage. If many people Email complaints to these news sources, those companies may realize that they are losing credibility -- the most precious asset of any news or information source.

We also hope that teachers can make use of this material to help their students develop analytical techniques -- "bologna detectors" -- to separate real information from disinformation and misinformation.

Finally, we hope that the future will see genuine dialogue between opposing groups in the religious and human sexuality fields, and that an effective conservative fact checking organization will be established.

Topics covered in this section:

bullet

What convinced us to start reporting on religious misinformation on the Internet
 

bullet

A more detailed explanation of the triggering event
 

bullet

Urban legends, pious frauds, forgeries, neat stories, relics, etc. (The jury is still out on some of these, particularly the relics)
 

bullet

Some examples of biased reporting:

bullet

Misrepresenting an episode of "Curb Your Enthusiasm" sitcom
 

bullet

A failed attempt to enter into dialog with supporters of creation science: Part 1   Part 2
 

bullet

A list of "proofs" of a Young Earth that web sites might want to avoid:  Part 1  Part 2
 

bullet

Are there 3 or 30 or more different sexual orientations? Are prostitution, bestiality, necrophilia really sexual orientations?
 

bullet

Christian web sites that describe Wicca with varying degrees of accuracy
 

bullet

Other examples of biased reporting:

Footnotes:

  1. LGBT is an an acronym of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and transgender persons/Transsexuals. So is other variations like GLBT, GLBTQ, GLBTI, etc. where "Q" refers to queer or questioning, and "I" refers to intersexual.
     

Site navigation:

Home > News > here

Copyright © 2009 to 2012 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2009-NOV-03
Latest update: 2012-JUL-31
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

Go to the previous page, or to "Current and past religious news" menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only.

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore the page to English.

 
 

Sponsored links