Prayer as a supplement to, or
a replacement for, medical treatment
Medical reports, web sites, etc.
that
are skeptical of the use of prayer alone
Sponsored link.
Medical reports skeptical of faith healing alone:
- Committee on Bioethics of the American Academy of Pediatrics published
an article titled: "Religious Objections to Medical Care"
in Pediatrics, 1997-FEB, Vol. 99, #2,
Pages 278-281. Online at:
http://www.cirp.org/
They reported:
"Government obligation arises from that interest when parental
religious practices subject minor children to possible loss of life
or to substantial risk of harm. Constitutional
guarantees of freedom of religion do not permit children to be
harmed through religious practices, nor do they allow religion to be
a valid legal defense when an individual harms or neglects a
child....."
"The AAP asserts that every
child should have the opportunity to grow and develop free from
preventable illness or injury. Children also have the right
to appropriate medical evaluation when it is likely that a serious
illness, injury, or other medical condition endangers their lives or
threatens substantial harm or suffering. Under these circumstances,
parents and other guardians have a responsibility to seek medical
treatment, regardless of their religious beliefs and preferences.
Unfortunately, certain groups have obtained exemptions from legal
sanctions and state child abuse and neglect reporting laws based on
the child's 'treatment' by spiritual means, such as prayer. The
overall effect has been to limit the government's ability to protect
children from abuse or neglect."
They recommended:
"The AAP calls for all those entrusted with the care of children to:
- show sensitivity to and flexibility toward the religious beliefs and practices of families;
- support legislation that ensures that all parents who deny their children medical care likely to prevent death or substantial harm or suffering are
held legally accountable;
- support the repeal of religious exemption laws; and
- work with other child advocacy organizations and agencies and religious institutions to develop coordinated and concerted public and professional
action to educate state officials, health care professionals, and the public about parents' legal obligations to obtain and necessary health medical care
for their children."
- An earlier statement by the same committee published in 1988-JAN and titled
"Religious Exemptions From Child Abuse Statutes" is available at:
http://www.cirp.org/
They note:
"...the constitutional guarantees of freedom
of religion do not sanction harming another person in the practice
of one's religion, and they do not allow religion to be a legal
defense when one harms another."
"Two important sets of interests are in apparent opposition -
those of children in the benefits of proven medical and health care
and those of parents in making a decision about their children's
well-being. Some parents believe that a constitutionally protected
freedom of religion allows them to deny their children some or all
of the benefits of standard medical intervention. However, this
interpretation of the US constitution is in contradiction to
important court rulings to the effect that parents may not martyr
their children based on parental beliefs and that children cannot be
denied essential health care."
- Seth M. Asser & Rita Swan authored an article titled "Child Fatalities From Religion-motivated
Medical Neglect" in the Pediatrics journal of the American Academy Of Pediatrics,
1998-APR-04, Vol. 101 #4, Page 625-629. 1998-APR-26.
They reported that:
They had found information on 172 known faith-related child
deaths in the U.S. between 1975 and 1995. The chance of survival of
140 of these children if they had received medical attention would
have been 90%. Eighteen other children would have had a survival
rate of 50%. All but three could have benefited from medical
treatment. See abstract at:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/
Sponsored link:
Web sites skeptical of faith healing alone:
- Children's Healthcare is a Legal Duty, Inc. has a home page at:
http://www.childrenshealthcare.org/
- "Death by Religious Exemption," Massachusetts Citizens for Children, at:
http://www.masskids.org/
- Mark Larabee & Peter D. Sleeth, "Faith healing raises questions of law's duty -- belief or life?," The Oregonian, 1998-JUN-07, at:
http://www.positiveatheism.org/
- David Kostinchuk, "Faith Healing: Child Abuse, Torture and Homicide," at:
http://www.positiveatheism.org/
- "A child's cancer, and her family's escape from a cult-like church." at:
http://geocities.com/
- "Colorado Children's Deaths Rekindle Debate on Religion" at:
http://www.sullivan-county.com/
- "Speech presented as part of the PA Non-Believers Day of Reason Rally," Harrisburg, PA, 2004-MAY-06, at:
http://members.aol.com/
- "Shield-law bills face easy win in [Oregon] House. The two measures aim to do away with criminal exemptions for parents who treat children
only with prayer," The Oregonian, 1999-MAR-05, at: http://www.rickross.com/
- "They were simply practicing their religious beliefs and are being punished unfairly," The Church of Critical Thinking, 2004-JUL-09,
at: http://www.churchofcriticalthinking.com/
- Seth Asser, "Religious Child Abuse," speech, 2002-NOV-02, at:
http://www.nospank.net/asser.htm
- "The Fraud of Faith Healing," Humanism by Joe, at:
http://www.humanismbyjoe.com/
- Marci Hamilton, "God vs. the gavel," Cambridge, (2005). An excerpt from the book dealing with "medical neglect" is shown on
the Buzzle.com web site. See: http://www.buzzle.com/ The book itself discusses topics
ranging from clerical immunity for alleged acts of child abuse to allowing Sikh youth to carry ceremonial knives in school. A fascinating book.
Read reviews or order this book safely from Amazon.com online book
store
Copyright © 2005 to 2008 by Ontario
Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2005-DEC-14
Latest update: 2008-NOV-13
Author: B.A. Robinson

Sponsored link:
|