Pascal's Wager: Is it safer to believe in God
even if there is no proof that God exists?
"This is conclusive, and if men are capable of any
truth, this is it." Blaise Pascal (allegedly said by him after finishing
his argument in his book "Pensées.)"
"I cannot conceive otherwise than that He, the Infinite Father,
expects or requires no worship or praise from us, but that He is even
infinitely above it." Benjamin Franklin, from his "Articles of
Belief and Acts of Religion," 1728-NOV-20.
"The reason Pascal’s wager does not work is the same reason why you
should never plan your retirement on winning the lotto." Massimo
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) was a 17th century French mathematician, inventor, and scientist. It was a great tragedy that he died at the age of 39. One wonders what he could have accomplished if his life span had been doubled.
One of his accomplishments for which he is famous today is "Pascal's Wager. It has been briefly paraphrased as:
"If you believe in God and turn out to be
incorrect, you have lost nothing -- but if you don't believe in God and
turn out to be incorrect, you will go to Hell. Therefore it is foolish to
be an atheist."1
The Internet Infidels have abbreviated Pascal's Wager into four simple statements:
One does not know whether God exists.
Not believing in God is bad for one's eternal soul if God does
Believing in God is of no consequence if God does not exist.
Therefore it is in one's interest to believe in God."
At first glance, Pascal's Wager may well sound very convincing. However deeper analysis shows that it has some weaknesses.