Were Adam and Eve the first humans?
An essay donated by Rev. Jim Persinger

Sponsored link.

I contend that Adam and Eve were not the first humans on Earth as believed
by...well virtually ever Christian and Jew on the planet. Humans were created on
the sixth day, God rested on the seventh and created Adam and Eve later.
The reason that the other humans are only vaguely referred to is because the
Old Testament, especially Genesis was written for the purpose of establishing
God as the creator and supreme being and to provide a genealogy, starting with
Adam and Eve, leading up to the birth of Christ. The other humans are simply not
important to the story. They are, however, mentioned vaguely as I am about to
prove. 
Genesis 1:24-28:
 | And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after
his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and
it was so. |
 | And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle
after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind:
and God saw that it was good. |
 | And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let
them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and
over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. |
 | So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;
male and female created he them. |
 | And God blessed them,
and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth,
and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of
the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
1,2 |
Compare the highlighted verse above to these:
Genesis 2:8-9:
 | And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he
put the man whom he had formed. |
 | And out of the ground made the LORD God to
grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of
life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and
evil. |
Genesis 2:15:
 | And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the Garden of Eden to
dress it and to keep it. |
Genesis 2:18-20:
 | And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I
will make him an help meet for him. |
 | And out of the ground the LORD God formed
every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam
to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living
creature, that was the name thereof. |
 | And Adam gave names to all cattle, and
to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there
was not found an help meet for him. |
These verses are important for three reasons:
- Humans were created on the sixth day and told to multiply and
replenish the earth and to have dominion over the whole earth but Adam
and Eve were placed in the Garden of Eden. That was to be their home.
- Verses Gen 1:27 -28 says that God created man and woman and
told them to multiply. In contrast, verses Gen 2:18 - 20 gives a
different account. According to this, Adam was originally meant to be
alone. It wasn't until after creating all the animals for Adam to see
and name that God created Eve. (BTW, it says he named them, not that he
alone had dominion over them, or that he had dominion over them at all.
Adam's world was a garden, he had no need for dominion over the world's
animal population.) The reason God re-created all the animals of the
world for Adam was to find him a help meet.
- In verses Gen 1:24 - 28 it states that man was created after the animals. Verses Gen 2:18 - 20 seem to be a direct
contradiction unless you realize were reading about two different times,
places and people(s).
After terraforming the earth, God put man and animal here and told mankind to
be fruitful and replenish the earth. Adam and Eve were placed in the Garden of
Eden and had perfect bodies. Had they not sinned, it's likely that they would
never have had children, would still be alive today and none (or few) of the
rest of the events mentioned in the Bible would have come to pass.

Genesis 1:31:
 | And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. |
Genesis 2:1-4:
 | Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of
them. |
 | And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he
rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. |
 | And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it
he had rested from all his work which God created and made. |
 | These are the generations of
the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD
God made the earth and the heavens, |
This is the end of the creation story and the beginning of the lineage of
Christ.

Genesis 2:5-7:
 | And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every
herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain
upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. |
 | But there
went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. |
 | And
the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his
nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. |
It's well documented scientifically that early mankind were hunter/gatherers,
not gardeners or farmers. This is a reference to them, not that there were no
humans at all. If all mankind were descended from Adam it's unlikely that the
knowledge of such a rudimentary skill as farming would be lost. If however, a
separate group of humans, the ones that were told to Be fruitful, and
multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the
fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that
moveth upon the earth, were not given the knowledge of farming, there
would not be a man to till the ground. The hunter/gatherers that
we know of scientifically and this other race of humans spoken of in the Bible
are one and the same.


Genesis 4:13-15:
 | And Cain said unto the LORD, My punishment is greater than I can bear. |
 | Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth;
and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in
the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall
slay me. |
 | And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain,
vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain,
lest any finding him should kill him. |
Who was Cain going to be a fugitive from? Who else was there, outside of
Eden, that Cain was afraid might kill him? Who was God protecting him from by
giving him the mark? His descendants or the descendants of future siblings?
Unlikely. Adam and Eve's future family would have respected Cain's banishment as
God's punishment. Retribution wouldn't have entered their minds. As for Cain's
descendants, had he not been protected by the mark, he could've simply not had
children. No, he was afraid of someone else. It was the other humans that he was
being protected from.

Genesis 4:16-18:
 | And Cain went out from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt in the
land of Nod, on the east of Eden. |
 | And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived,
and bare Enoch: F30 and he builded a city, and called the name of the city,
after the name of his son, Enoch. |
 | And unto Enoch was born Irad: and Irad
begat Mehujael: and Mehujael begat Methusael: and Methusael begat Lamech.
|
Who was Cain's wife? Except for Eve, no woman is mentioned in the Bible up to
this point. It's been argued that he married an unnamed sister. Admitting that
there were other humans not mentioned, whether a sister or whomever, just helps
me make my point. It's logical that if someone as important as a member of
Adam's family is not mentioned, other humans, who were of virtually no
importance to the story at hand wouldn't be mentioned either.

Words for "man" in Genesis:
In Genesis, two different words are translated as "man". (Actually three, but
the other usually refers generically to a child or youth)
One being 'iysh {eesh}, Strong's # 0376
Outline of Biblical Usage
1) man
a) man, male (in contrast to woman, female)
b) husband
c) human being, person (in contrast to God)
d) servant
e) mankind
f) champion
g) great man
2) whosoever
3) each (adjective)
The other is 'adam {aw-dawm'}which is the same word as the name Adam
'adam {aw-dawm'} Strong's # 0120
Outline of Biblical Usage
1) man, mankind
a) man, human being
b) man, mankind (much more frequently intended sense in OT)
c) Adam, first man
d) city in Jordan valley
Easton's Bible Dictionary defines Man (as used in Genesis) as:
- Heb. 'Adam, used as the proper name of the first man. The name is derived
from a word meaning "to be red," and thus the first man was called Adam because
he was formed from the red earth. It is also the generic name of the human race.
Its equivalents are the Latin homo and the Greek anthropos. It denotes also man
in opposition to woman.
- Heb. 'ish, like the Latin vir and Greek aner, denotes properly a man in
opposition to a woman, a husband; man with reference to excellent mental
qualities.
The above highlighted part of the definition gives credence to my theory since
the second definition is used exclusively for Adam and his descendants. The
first definition is used only when speaking of man or mankind in general or as
the proper name for the first man mentioned by name. It's likely that the other
humans, as a group, were not as intelligent as Adam and his descendants were,
given the fact that they didn't know how to farm. The two distinct words used to
denote man or mankind and their usage is strong indication that the Bible is
speaking of two different groups of humans.
The name Adam and the word "man" mean the same thing. Adam is the name of the
first "man" mentioned by name. The word "man" is used when speaking about
mankind in general or as a group. Only when talking about Adam personally is his
name used.
The humans of today may be descendants of both Adam and the other race. Cain
married into the other race and so did Adam's other descendants. Noah's family
was likely of mixed race and since we're descended from them, we are as well.
This research shows a direct connection between scientific data and biblical
history. One does not have to contradict the other...they compliment each other.
Instead of scientists stating the Bible is wrong and the church dismissing
science, we should examine the evidence presented here and agree that both are
right.

Footnotes:
- All references are taken from the King James Version of the Bible,
Strong's Exhaustive Concordance and Easton's Bible Dictionary.
- All emphasis (in bold) are by the author.

Site navigation:

Originally posted: 2006-MAR-04
Latest update: 2006-MAR-04
Author: Rev. Jim Persinger

|