Quantcast
About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitor essays
Our forum
New essays
Other site features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
.
CHRISTIANITY
Who is a Christian?
Shared beliefs
Handle change
Bible topics
Bible inerrancy
Bible harmony
Interpret Bible
Persons
Beliefs, creeds
Da Vinci code
Revelation, 666
Denominations
.
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Other spirituality
Cults and NRMs
Comparing religions

About all religions
Important topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handle change
Doubt/security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
World's end
One true religion?
Seasonal topics
Science v. Religion
More info.

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality/ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten commandm'ts
Abortion
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment
Equal rights - gays & bi's
Gay marriage
Nudism
Origins of the species
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

 

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

A Roman Catholic apology for the past sins of its members

Negative review of our essays
on Pope John Paul II's apology:

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.


horizontal rule

"Locksley," a visitor to this web site objected to our discussion of the apology. He wrote:

With respect, I found your review of Pope John Paul II's astounding and heartfelt apology in AD 2000 devoid of any historical retrospective or realization of the implications of the Church humbling herself in the eyes of the world.

There was not one word of appreciation for the Roman Catholic Church, the faith held by 1/6 of the people on earth for taking this necessary step to break through real and imagined resentment for her existence.

Although you refer to the fact that Catholic theology teaches that the Church herself is pure and unspotted, that teaching is itself made to look like an insult to Pagans, Jews, Muslims and women. You suggested - in a rather demanding way - that the Church rethink its policy on married clergy, abortion, female ordination, withholding sacraments from divorced and remarried Catholics and homosexual marriage, apparently with no regard to biblical injunctions and the Church's teaching of those biblical injunctions.

I noted, when it served your purpose, you quote from St Augustine, offering an opinion about the viability of fetal life in the womb, as though Augustine was some kind of early gynecological expert. You exalt his opinion on something he could only guess at to 'church teaching'. While it's true that much of Augustine's philosophic idea have been reviewed over the centuries and are accepted as accurate explanations for the fallen nature of humanity, predestination and similar topics, Augustine has not been declared infallible and incapable of error.

Your correspondent seems free of understanding the differences between dogma, doctrine within the infallible magisterium of the Church and disciplines within the Church.

The acceptance of divorce and remarriage, for example, entails a complete denial of the words of Christ in Matthew 19, in which Jesus quite clearly denies the validity of divorce and remarriage and condemns both practices with harsh language.

Through the centuries, the Catholic Church demanded kings and commoners to treat their wives with dignity. This attitude stands in sharp contrast to Jewish, Moslem and Protestant practice which has often allowed divorce for the most trivial of reasons.

The women put out of the houses of their husbands - you make no mention of them. While sometimes husbands returned the dowries with the wives, most often these women were sent away to fend for themselves with nothing but the clothes on their backs. Again, this is but an example of the highly myopic and totally skeptical eye with which you regarded the efforts of Pope John Paul to put aside any trace of hatred and misunderstanding.

Your presentation in regard to this humble papal admission that all too often Catholics missed the mark, left me with the distasteful impression that it is a trick.

Indeed, I gathered from this article that this apology is not enough, that the Catholic Church should stand accused at the World Court under subpoena of genocide and crimes against humanity.

I don't see your organization as promoting tolerance as much as it promotes indifference.

The article made it clear that your organization denies that any religion can claim to be of divine origin: all are equally good and all are equally bad - except that evil old Roman Catholic Church which is really beyond the pale, no matter what her leaders say.

I doubt I will pay much attention to anything else the "Religious Tolerance" website puts out, since I see it is devoted to the concept of 'whatever the moral market will bear," viz. the secular humanism, secular progressivism, political correctness and moral relativism of the Culture of Death.

it is my sincere hope that, from a perspective of six years, one of your writers will take a second look at the humility of Pope John Paul II. Still, I have a feeling in my gut that you will not.

I regret that you do not return answers to emails. I'm sorry you've been subjected to hate and intolerance. Having read your piece, I know the feeling.

I also regret that you do not live up to the 'religious tolerance" your headline trumpets. Indeed, regarding Catholic teaching, methinks thou dost protest too much.

horizontal rule

Site navigation:

 Home > Christianity > Groups > Catholic Church > Apology > here

 Home > Christianity > Groups > Catholic Church > Anti-semitism > Apology > here

Home > World Religions > Judaism > Anti-semitism > Apology > here

horizontal rule

Originally posted: 2007-FEB-07, with the permission of the author
Latest update: 2007-FEB-07
Author: "Locksley"

line.gif (538 bytes)


horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or to the "Roman Catholic apology" menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?


Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.