CATHOLIC GUIDELINES FOR POLITICIANS & OTHER BELIEVERS
Threatening politicians & members
with denial of communion, and worse
Sponsored link:
According to ReligionLink, a major conflict surfaced within the
Roman Catholic Church as a result of the Roe vs. Wade decision by
the U.S. Supreme court in 1973. It legalizing abortion access.
ReligionLink wrote:
"Lay Catholics - and Catholic politicians - increasingly began to support
abortion rights, while the bishops, especially under the pontificate of Pope
John Paul II (elected in 1978), became increasingly active in opposing them.
Although Catholic politicians once worried about a Protestant backlash, they
now worry about internal opposition."
"Since Roe vs. Wade, the only Catholic on a major-party ticket was Democrat
Geraldine Ferraro of New York in1984, who was drawn into a widely covered
dispute with the late New York Cardinal John O'Connor. In 1990 O'Connor
wrote that Catholics who opposed the Church's teachings on abortion 'must be
warned that they are at a risk of excommunication. If such actions persist,
bishops may consider excommunication the only option'."
"The conflicts prompted New York Gov. Mario Cuomo - another Catholic
politician, and one-time presidential contender - to address the issue in a
famous 1984 speech at Notre Dame University titled 'Religious Belief and
Public Morality: A Catholic Governor's Perspective'." 10
"There must be
no confusion in these matters. Any Catholic politicians who advocate for
abortion, for illicit stem cell research or for any form of euthanasia ipso
facto place themselves outside full communion with the Church and so
jeopardize their salvation. Any Catholics who vote for candidates who stand
for abortion, illicit stem cell research or euthanasia suffer the same
fateful consequences. It is for this reason that these Catholics, whether
candidates for office or those who would vote for them, may not receive Holy
Communion until they have recanted their positions and been reconciled with
God and the Church in the Sacrament of Penance."
2
Later in his letter, he
extended this prohibition to include politicians who support same-sex marriage.
Roman Catholic Church
teachings on these matters:
The Church opposes:
Same-sex
marriage: In the U.S., the federal and state governments
automatically grant on the order of 1,400 rights and
benefits to all opposite-sex couples who marry. The church opposes these
being granted to same-sex couples. Their interpretation of the Bible
precludes any form of same-sex marriage or civil
union. Unlike other conservative religious denominations, the Roman Catholic
Church does teach that, in most cases, a person's sexual orientation is not
chosen and is unchangeable. However, in common with other religious
conservatives, it regards minority sexual orientations
as abnormal, unnatural, and disordered. They expect persons with a
homosexual orientation to remain celibate. They
expect persons with a bisexual orientation -- those who are sexually
attracted to both men and women -- to restrict their sexual relationships to
a member of the opposite sex, and then only within marriage.
The Catholic Encyclopedia defines homosexuality as: "...Sexual activity between persons of the same sex. It
is not a normal condition, the acts being against nature are objectively
wrong." 3 Bishop
Sheridan writes: "no one has a right to that which flies in the face of
God’s own design. Marriage is not an invention of individuals or even of
societies. Rather it is an element of God’s creation. It is God who created
us male and female. It is God who joined man and woman so that they could be
fruitful and multiply and fill the earth. Every civilization known to
mankind has understood marriage as the union of a man and a woman for the
procreation and rearing of children." 2 This
statement appeals to conflict with the description of
eight types of marriages and families mentioned
in the Bible.
Abortion access: The Roman Catholic
Church is one of the largest supporters of the pro-life movement in
the U.S. They teach that human life, in the form of an ovum and
spermatozoon, becomes a human person at the instant of conception. Thus,
they teach that abortion causes the murder of an
innocent human person -- whether it be a pre-embryo, embryo or fetus. They believe that
human life must be preserved from conception to natural death.
In his encyclical Humanae Vitae, Pope Paul VI wrote: "It is not licit, even for
the gravest reasons to do evil so that good may follow there from, that is, to
make into the object of a positive act of the will something which is
intrinsically disordered, and hence unworthy of the human person, even when the
intention is to safeguard or promote individual, family or social well
being...directly willed and procured abortion, even if for therapeutic reasons
[is] to be absolutely excluded." 9
When a delivery goes terribly wrong, and the attending physicians have the choice of:
Killing the fetus, and saving the life of the woman, or
Allowing nature to take its course, and watching both the woman and fetus
die,
the moral decision in the eyes of the church is the latter.
The church does make exceptions in a few unusual cases, like ectopic
pregnancies, where the death of a fetus is an indirect result of a medical
procedure.
Stem cell research: Human stem cells are primitive cells that can
theoretically be coaxed to develop into any of the over 200 cell types in
the human body. Some can be extracted from adult humans; others are removed
from pre-embryos. The church opposes the extraction or use of the latter,
because they regard pre-embryos as human persons, and because the removal of
the stem cells results in its death. Unfortunately, adult stem cells have
limited potential, whereas stem cells from pre-embryos have great potential
to treat and cure many diseases which cause disability and premature death.
Physician assisted suicide: The church opposes all suicide,
whether it is performed by an individual alone or with the help of their
physician. They teach that all human life must be protected, from conception
to natural death. A person has no right to terminate their life, even if
they are in intractable, untreatable pain from a terminally illness.
Implications of this
announcement:
Since almost
all of the politicians who support one or more of the forbidden
activities and who
stand a chance of being elected to office are Democrats, this statement
effectively prohibits Roman Catholics from voting for almost all Democratic
candidates. Bishop Sheridan wrote in the diocese's newspaper 2 that the 2004
Presidential election will be one of the most important in history -- "critical
in the battle to restore the right to life of all its citizens,
especially the unborn and the elderly and infirm." This was an
apparent a
reference to the expected appointment of three or four replacement justices to
the U.S. Supreme Court by the next president. The choice of
appointees will have a profound
effect on the American culture for decades in the future.
The church teaches that
any Roman Catholic who commits a moral sin and who does not have access to
church sacraments, will spend eternity in Hell, which
the church considers to be both a place and a state of being. To a believer,
denial of sacraments is a matter of paramount importance.
In order for a sin to
be classified as a mortal sin, three requirements must be met:
It must be a
considered a serious sin by the church. This criteria is certainly met in
the above matters.
The individual
must be aware of the sin. All political leaders and most Catholic voters
would be aware of the Church's position.
The person must
have freely decided to sin. External pressures, such as politicians
inevitably experience, may give them some wiggle room here.
John Kerry, the presumed Democratic presidential nominee is both a
Catholic and a supporter of abortion access. Independent candidate Ralph
Nader supports the availability of the abortion medication RU-486, and a woman's
access to abortion. 8 Devout Roman Catholics -- at least those
who live in the diocese of Colorado Springs and who follow the instructions of
their bishop -- have little option but to vote Republican in the 2004-NOV
elections.
Other bishops have threatened to deny communion to politicians who
deviate from the church's teaching in social matters. However, this is
the first instance in the U.S. where a bishop has threatened voters with sanctions.
Freedom of conscience:
In his pastoral letter,
Bishop Sheridan describes the limits imposed on Roman Catholics
when they make individual moral decisions.The Church teaches that an
adult "...has the right to act in conscience and in freedom so as personally
to make moral decisions." 4
This belief is held in common by followers of essentially all secular and
religious movements. However, to Catholic believers, this freedom does not mean
that an individual has the right to analyze a situation using all available
sources of information, consider all possible options, decide which is the the
most moral -- or the least immoral -- alternative, and act on their decision.
Rather, the church teaches that "Conscience must be informed and moral
judgment enlightened. A well-formed conscience is upright and truthful. It
formulates its judgments according to reason, in conformity with the true good
willed by the wisdom of the Creator." 5
Thus, a Catholic's moral decisions must adhere to the truth, as found in natural
law and God's revelation. Further, they must follow the doctrinal and moral
teachings of the Church, because: "to the Church belongs the right always and
everywhere to announce moral principles, including those pertaining to the
social order, and to make judgments on any human affairs to the extent that they
are required by the fundamental rights of the human person or the salvation of
souls." 6 The
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has outlined the proper behavior
for Catholic politicians. They stated that, "...a well-formed Christian
conscience does not permit one to vote for a political program or an individual
law which contradicts the fundamental contents of faith and morals." 7
Proposed document by the U.S. Bishops:
LifeSiteNews.com reported on 2006-OCT-20:
The U.S. bishops will vote
on a proposed document, "Happy Are Those Who Are Called To His Supper: On
Preparing To Receive Christ Worthily in the Eucharist" during their annual
November meeting in Baltimore, Nov. 13-16.
The document, addressed to all the faithful, points out that Catholics may
not receive communion if they are do not accept Church teaching on matters such
as abortion and homosexuality. Catholics should refrain from Holy Communion,
says the document, "when they lack adherence to what the Church authoritatively
teaches on matters of faith and morals."
The document is designed to help Catholics properly prepare to receive Holy
Communion. It is organized as a series of questions and answers, and explores
topics such as what the Catholic Church believes about the Eucharist, who may
receive Holy Communion, and how Catholics can prepare to receive the sacrament
more worthily
The statement reiterates Church teaching that with "few exceptions, only
those who are members of the Catholic Church may receive Holy Communion at a
Catholic Eucharist." Catholics should strive "to receive Holy Communion
regularly, gratefully, and worthily," but should refrain from the sacrament when
they find themselves no longer in a state of grace because of mortal sin, which
is an act violating God's law that involves grave matter and that is performed
with both full knowledge and complete consent of the will. Catholics who are
conscious of committing any mortal sin must receive the Sacrament of Penance
before receiving Holy Communion, it says.
In addition to preparations by prayer and scripture reading, confession and
fasting, the document also suggests that Catholics should prepare for communion
by "wearing modest and tasteful dress during the liturgy."
While this document to the faithful did not address it, the current Pope
Benedict XVI while still as Cardinal Ratzinger the head of the Congregation for
the Doctrine of the Faith, told the US Bishops that "Apart from an individual's
judgment about his worthiness to present himself to receive the Holy Eucharist,
the minister of Holy Communion may find himself in the situation where he must
refuse to distribute Holy Communion to someone."
The letter from Cardinal Ratzinger to the US Bishops continued, "Regarding
the grave sin of abortion or euthanasia, when a person's formal cooperation
becomes manifest (understood, in the case of a Catholic politician, as his
consistently campaigning and voting for permissive abortion and euthanasia
laws), his Pastor should meet with him, instructing him about the Church's
teaching, informing him that he is not to present himself for Holy Communion
until he brings to an end the objective situation of sin, and warning him that
he will otherwise be denied the Eucharist."
"When these precautionary measures have not had their effect or in which they
were not possible," concluded the Cardinal "and the person in question, with
obstinate persistence, still presents himself to receive the Holy Eucharist, the
minister of Holy Communion must refuse to distribute it." 11
References:
"U.S. voters warned by bishop," Los Angeles Times, reprinted
in the Toronto Star, 2004-MAY-15, Page A16.
Michael
Sheridan, "A pastoral letter to the Catholic faithful
of the Diocese of Colorado Springs on the duties of Catholic politicians
and voters," at:
http://www.diocesecs.org
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, "Doctrinal note on some questions regarding the
participation of Catholics in political life," Offices of the Congregation for
the Doctrine of the Faith, 2002-NOV-24, at:
http://www.vatican.va/
Pope Paul VI, "Humanae Vitae. Encyclical of Pope Paul VI on the
regulation of birth," 1968-JUL-25, at:
http://www.vatican.va/
"KENNEDY TO KERRY: Kerry, Catholics and the White House,"
ReligionLink.org, 2004-MAY-03, at:
http://www.religionlink.org/
John-Henry Westen, "US Bishops Set to Tell Catholics Opposed to
Teaching on Abortion or Homosexuality not to Receive Communion",
LifeSiteNews, 2006-OCT-20, at:
http://www.lifesite.net/