Government-funded religious schools in Canada
Ontario

Sponsored link.

History:
Early in the 19th century, various religious and charitable groups began to
establish schools in Canada. By the middle of that century, colonial governments
were faced with a Catholic minority in Ontario who didn't want their children
learning Protestant beliefs, and a Protestant minority in Quebec who didn't want
their children being exposed to Roman Catholic beliefs. So the governments of
Upper and Lower Canada -- now called Ontario and Quebec -- established dual
school systems in each province: one Protestant and the other Catholic. Section
93 the Constitution Act of 1867, guaranteed that the two
government-funded school systems would continue.
During the second half of the 20th century, the
Protestant school system in Ontario gradually became secular. The author can recall
from the late 1940s morning Protestant prayers and school assemblies with
sermons by visiting Protestant ministers. He recalls reading
newspaper advertisements during the early 1960s in the Kingston ON paper seeking
"Protestant music teachers." These were placed by rural school
boards
that hadn't quite wrapped their mind around accepting the transition from Protestant-based to secular-based
schooling.
Prior to 1985, the Ontario Government only funded elementary Roman Catholic
separate schools. In that year as his last act before retiring, premier Bill
Davis (Conservative) extended full funding to Catholic high schools. This was a
very controversial move that caused a loss of voter support for the Conservative
party at the time. Schools run by other religious groups continued to receive no funding
at all.
In 1999, the United Nations Human Rights Committee ruled that the Ontario system was
religiously discriminatory. They suggested that:
 | Either all faith-based schools be fully funded by the provincial
government, |
 | Or no such schools be funded. |
By 2007 of the approximately 2.2 million students in Ontario's elementary and
high schools:
 | 95% of students attend publicly funded schools, of whom 31% Catholic go
to separate schools and 69% attend secular public schools. |
 | 2% attend faith-based private schools: Hindu, Jewish, Christian, Muslim
etc. They are financed by religious institutions and parents. |
 | 3% attend secular private schools and are financed by their parents.
1 |

Attempts to change the system:
On 2007-AUG-27, representatives of the Armenian, Hindu,
Jewish, Muslim, and
Sikh communities formed the Education Fairness Network (EFN). They asked
the Ontario government to fund all faith-based schools that met provincial
standards. Howard English, a spokesperson for EFN and the United Jewish
Appeal Federation of greater Toronto said:
"The current situation is unfair and indefensible. When one uses the term
public education, we're not talking about a secular system, we're talking
about a system that already includes about 650,000 faith-based students who
go to Catholic schools. We're saying that it's unjust to provide funding for
one faith-based system that meets provincial standards while keeping other
students out. These schools believe very strongly that a faith-based system
would reflect the diversity of 21st-century Ontario."
1
Colleen Schenk, vice-president and spokesperson for the Ontario Public
School Boards Association (OPSBA) opposes the extension of funding for
either faith-based or secular private schools in Ontario. She said:
"We feel that it's very divisive," She referred to the creation
of "silos" where people of different faiths focus on their differences. In contrast, the OPSBA feels
that public education in multi-cultural provinces like Ontario helps to unite
students.
1 Southern Ontario has been
described as the most religiously diverse region of any country in the world. Elaine MacNeil, president
of the Ontario English Catholic Teachers' Association (OECTA) said:
"There's a fair bit of worry among teachers about what all this
controversy might mean for us down the road, and our members do not support
funding private schools. ... We'll do whatever we have to do to protect our
system from any challenge to our constitutional rights."
6

Sponsored link:

The conflict, leading up to the 2007 Ontario election:
An election is scheduled for 2007-OCT-10. The topic of extending funding to
all faith-based schools dominated the first few weeks of campaigning.
 | The Progressive Conservative (PC) party, headed by an appropriately named leader "John
Tory," promoted government funding of all of those faith-based schools that hire
certified teachers, participate in provincial testing, and teach the Ontario
curriculum. If he becomes premier of Ontario, he promised to create a Fairness Implementation Commission, headed by former
premier Bill Davis, that would recommend how to extend full funding to
non-Catholic religious schools. 5
Commentator Jeffery Ewener speculates that the PC's hoped to: |
"... drive a wedge between ethnic voters
and their beloved Liberals. It would undermine the government's claim on
its proudest and most legitimate area of achievement, that of public
education. ... It would create, in secular, small-l liberal Ontario, the
same solid religious conservative base that brought George W. Bush and
his allies to power in the United States." 12
Unfortunately, for Tory and the PCs, the issue
of faith-based school funding was a major political disaster that snatched
defeat out of the jaws of victory.
 | The Liberal Party and New Democratic Party (a socialist party) proposed retaining the status quo
-- government funding of both public and Roman Catholic faith-based schools,
while withholding financial support from other faith-based schools. There is
a near consensus in Ontario that this arrangement is a form of unfair
religious discrimination. But there is no consensus at this time about how
to change the system. |
 | The Green Party proposed a single government-supported secular
system, an end to government-supported Roman
Catholic schools, and a mandatory world religion class to promote
religious tolerance.
2 |
The debate led in many different directions:
 | Substantial support surfaced in Ontario for the elimination
of government support for the Roman Catholic separate system in favor of a
single secular public system. |
 | Comedian Rick Mercer, in the season premiere of his Rick Mercer Report
program "joked that Osama bin Laden released a short video endorsing John
Tory's move to fund religious schools."
2 |
 | Some candidates from the Progressive Conservative party bolted from the
party platform and said they would vote against Tory's plan. The Canadian
Press obtained responses from 91 Conservative party candidates during the
first week of 2007-OCT. They found that 28 (31%) would vote against funding;
11 (12%) would support it, and 52 (57%) were undecided.
7 |
 | Near the end of the campaign, John Tory changed his position and said
that if he won the election, he would allow a free vote in the legislature on his plan to fund
all faith-based schools. (Members of the legislature are normally expected
to vote strictly according to the party line on most bills). Tory was
accused of performing a flip-flop by some political commentators. |
 | Father Alphonse de Valk of the Catholic Insight magazine said that the
magazine" |
"... sees no choice but to abandon the policy of supporting
worthy candidates in all parties. Instead, we will support only the
candidates of the small, centrist, pro-people Family Coalition
Party. The situation is so bad that it would be inexcusable for
us to do otherwise. ... the NDP and the Greens are constitutionally
committed to a pro-death, anti-human philosophy. ... The leaders of
the Ontario Liberal and the Progressive Conservative parties have
now also made it impossible for family-minded Canadians to vote for
them. 3
He took a swipe at the federal Liberal Party that:
"... from Pierre Trudeau (1968-1984) to Paul Martin (2004-2006),
mocked human Reason, Tradition and Religion with anti-family
policies sanctioning contraception, divorce,
pornography and same-sex ‘marriage,’
matched only by their pro-death abortion
and embryonic stem-cell legislation.
(Religious conservatives often place the word "marriage" in "same-sex
marriage" in quotation marks to denigrate same-sex couples and indicate
that they consider same-sex marriage to be a false form of
quasi-marriage.)
Fr. De Valk rejected the Tory plan to fund faith-based schools
because it would:
"... bring those schools under the complete control of the
Ontario Ministry of Education, which means adopting its same sex
and other propaganda courses."
3
 | Haroon Siddiqui, a columnist for the
Toronto Star newspaper, wrote on 2007-OCT-07 that the Tory plan to fund
faith-based schools failed because of: |
"public unease with Muslims and
Islam, blatant in the first instance, implicit yet not at all
that hidden in the second. ... Now Protestant, Jewish, Hindu,
Sikh and other faith schools may pay the price for fear of
Muslim schools being funded. ... it is strange to argue
that funding 675,000 students in Ontario Catholic schools has
not destroyed the public system but funding another 53,000
would. Implicit in that argument is
the notion that Catholics, whom we didn't trust at one time, are
now acceptable but Jews, Hindus and Sikhs are not. Or that they
all are but Muslims are not. Opposition to abortion, gay
marriage and women priests from Catholics can be tolerated, but
not from orthodox Jews, Muslims and others."
 | Siddiqui and all of the other commentators and
politicians that we have studied seem to assume assume that no
additional students would join the 53,000 students who currently go
to faith-based schools if the latter were funded. In fact, there are
numerous families that are only prevented from sending their
children to those schools because of the high cost. If the cost were
reduced to zero, the enrollment might easily quadruple. |
 | Seventy percent of readers in a recent Toronto Star
poll favored a single secular school system and zero funding to
funding of Roman Catholic and all other faith-based schools. |
 | Some thoughts by Catholic students. Those interviewed were all about 13 years-of-age:
 | Nora Butris: "Even the thought of making Catholic schools
(the same as) public is preposterous and outrageous – we really
need religion in our lives. ... Put all students of different
religions in one building together? It would be like Jerusalem –
religious wars." |
 | Rohmel Andrew: "In public schools you don't learn about God
or Jesus and I think it's important to learn about how we came
to be." |
 | Ina Zaka said that being around fellow Catholics
"encourages me to be more Christianlike and be a role model to
the younger kids." |
|
 | Some thoughts by Catholic students about 8 years-of-age who were
interviewed in Grade
3:
 | "Catholic schools mean you go to church – and you pray." |
 | "Catholic schools don't let you wear a tank top or use bad
language." |
 | "At Catholic schools we learn about God – but public schools
worship a different God." 6 |
|
 | There has been very little discussion
about topics on which faith-based schools
in Ontario differ in their teaching from public schools. This frequently happens
with regard to gender,
sexual orientation,
sexual identity and
sex-ed. With the exception of some liberal
Jewish schools, almost all faith-based schools reflect the most
conservative wings of their religions. Their denominations
frequently teach that women and men are to be assigned different
roles in the family, employment and church: positions of power are
typically reserved for men. Women are expected to submit. These same
denominations generally teach that homosexuality is hated by God, is
chosen, abnormal, unnatural, and changeable. They teach sexual
abstinence and often downplay information on contraceptives and how
students can avoid sexually transmitted diseases. These beliefs are
generally in conflict with the government's policies and with the
beliefs of most Ontarians. |
 | There has been considerable discussion
on the negative effect that a multiplicity of faith-based schools
would have on social cohesion in the province. The benefits of
educating children and youth of all races, religions cultures,
genders, sexual orientations, sexual identities together have also
been discussed. |
 | In spite of Tory's effort to defuse
the faith-based school issue near the end of the election, the PCs
lost. The Liberal Party was returned in a majority government with
an increased number of seats. Dalton McGuinty became the first
Liberal Party leader of Ontario in seven decades to have returned
two consecutive majority governments. |

Poll results:
 | 2007-SEP-10: Ipsos Reid reported on a poll sponsored
by CanWest News Service. They determined that:
 | 35% of Ontarians supported full funding of all
faith-based schools that comply with provincial standards. |
 | 62% opposed such funding. |
 | 3% were undecided or did not answer. This is a rather
small percentage and may indicate the degree of polarization over this
topic. 8,9 |
|
 | 2007-SEP-6 to 9: Environics reported:
 | 48% support support full funding of all faith-based
schools that comply with provincial standards. |
 | 22% are strongly supportive. |
 | 44% oppose such funding |
 | 31% strongly oppose it |
 | 501 Ontario adults polled; margin of error =
±4.4% |
 | The major differences between the Ipsos Reid and
Environics polls is probably due to the precise wording of the question
asked, and what questions were asked prior to the one on school funding. |
Environics has polled Ontarians on funding of all
faith-based schools since 1986. Support has been steadily slipping:
 | 1986: 71% support |
 | 1991: 57% |
 | 1994: 54% |
 | 2007: 48% 9,10 |
|
 | 2007-OCT-08: The Toronto
Star maintains a group of "Star Advisers" and online panel of readers. More
than 470 members of the group responded to questions on faith-based school
funding:
 | 70% favored ending financial
support for Catholic schools in favor of a single taxpayer-funded public
school system |
 | 23% favor the status quo. |
 | 7% favored John Tory's
proposal. 11 |
|

References used:
The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above
essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.
-
Jennifer Wilson, "Faith-based schools," CBC News, 2007-SEP-17,
at:
http://www.cbc.ca/
-
Kristin Roshowy, "Ontario Votes," The Toronto Star, 2007-OCT-08,
Page A15.
-
Fr. Alphonse de Valk, "Ontario needs the Family Coalition
Party," Catholic Insight, 2007-JUL/AUG issue, at:
http://catholicinsight.com/
-
HaroonSiddiqui, "Ontario democracy fails faith-based test of
maturity," The Toronto Star, 2007-OCT-07, at:
http://www.thestar.com/
-
Gerald Vandezande, "Fairness and faith-based funding," The Toronto Star,
2007-OCT-03, at:
http://www.thestar.com/
-
Louise Brown, "Catholic schools feel fallout of Tory's idea," The Toronto Star,
2007-OCT-08, at:
http://www.thestar.com/
-
Steve Rennie & Sean Patrick
Sullivan, "Conservatives divided on faith-based schools," The Canadian Press,
2007-OCT-08, at:
http://www.thestar.com/
-
"Faith-Based Funding A Clear Loser
For John Tory, But Desire For Change Buttresses Conservatives. Lack Of Faith In
McGuinty’s Leadership VS Tory’s Support For Faith-Based School Funding Weigh On
Voters Support," Ipsos Reid, 2007-SEP-10, at:
http://www.ipsos-na.com Full access requires subscription.
-
Jennifer Wilson, "Faith-based
schools," CBC News, 2007-SEP-17, at:
http://www.cbc.ca/
-
"Ontarians divided over proposal
to extend public funding to all religious schools," Environics, 2007-SEP-13, at:
http://erg.environics.net/
-
Rob Ferguson, "Go to one public
system, panel says," The Toronto Star. 2007-OCT-08, at:
http://www.thestar.com/
-
Jeffery Ewener, "Religious right
and wrong," The Toronto Star, 2007-OCT-10, Page AA8. Online at:
http://www.thestar.com/

Site navigation:

Copyright © 2007 & 2008 by Ontario Consultants on
Religious Tolerance
Originally posted: 2007-OCT-08
Latest update: 2008-JAN-31
Author: B.A. Robinson

|