|
Handling surplus embryos in fertility clinics
Ethical concerns about
discarding surplus embryos

Sponsored link.

In order to understand why the surplus embryos represent a serious
concern to some people, it is necessary to
study the basics of human personhood, the activities
of the pro-life community, and procedures performed in fertility clinics:

When does personhood begin?
No consensus exists about when
human life becomes a human person.
Human life can be defined as any living entity that contains human DNA.
Thus, each adult or child skin cell, spermatozoa, an ovum, a just-fertilized
ovum, a pre-embryo
which consists of a group of identical stem cells, an embryo which
consists of differentiated cells, a fetus, a newborn, and even a human
cancer are all forms of human life. But human life is not necessarily
considered to be a human person by everyone; in many cases it is not even
regarded as particularly valuable.
 | Most pro-choicers believe that the transition from human life to
human personhood is achieved part way through pregnancy, or perhaps at
birth. Thus, the value and status of an pre-embryo lies in its ability for
future development into a human person, if it is given the proper environment.
A pre-embryo is respected because of its future potential, but is not
yet assigned the status of a human person. It is seen as one step beyond that
of an ovum or spermatozoa towards personhood. Some view it as a collection
of live, human cells containing human DNA -- much like a microscopic piece
of adult skin.
People are not usually concerned about the loss human DNA
posed by tens of millions of spermatozoa in a single male
ejaculation, or the rejection by a fertile woman's body of an unfertilized egg
approximately once every four weeks. So also, many pro-choice person do not assign
major
importance to pre-embryos. The existence of hundreds of thousands of
frozen pre-embryos in fertility clinics is thus of little concern to
them -- at least in comparison to other moral issues such as sexism,
racism, homophobia, child abuse, etc.
|
 | Pro-lifers generally regard the
start of human personhood as occurring during or shortly after the process
of conception. A strict pro-life position would thus regard all of the following as possibly causing the murder
of human person(s):
 | Insertion of an Intra-Uterine Device (IUD). This generally prevents
fertilization of ova, but can in some instances change the environment of the uterus to bar the
"implantation of a fertilized egg." 1
|
 | Emergency contraception (a.k.a. the Morning-After Pill) which
generally prevents ovulation or conception. In rare instances, it can
also prevent the
implantation of an already-fertilized egg.
|
 | Medically induced abortions, Vacuum aspiration
abortions, surgical abortions, or RU-486, an abortifacient medication.
|
 | Discarding unwanted, "surplus" pre-embryos in fertility clinics,
and allowing them to die.
|
 | Harvesting the stem cells from a pre-embryo, and thus causing its
death.
|
|
|
Many pro-lifers look at the inventory of frozen embryos in a fertility
clinic as a potential adoption facility. Some would view the harvesting
of stem cells as ethically equivalent to Nazi medical experimentations
during the Holocaust. Some view any discarding of embryos to be multiple
murder.

Sponsored link:

Primary pro-life activities:
Although IUDs cause tens of
millions of deaths of fertilized embryos each year in North America --
many more than the approximately 1.2 million surgical abortions -- little pro-life
activity has focused on the use of IUDs. There is little if any mention in the
news of pro-lifers picketing factories where IUDs are manufactured. The Roman
Catholic Church opposes the use of IUDs, the discarding of surplus embryos,
in-vitro fertilizations, and artificial insemination. Fundamentalist and other
evangelical faith groups also oppose IUDs and discarding surplus embryos.
However they are much less vocal about it than are Catholics. But Christians
generally invest much less effort into combating these devices and procedures
than they invest into anti-abortion clinic activities. Yet, in their eyes, the
former result in the murder of many more human beings than do the latter.
The number of embryos that have been discarded or will be
abandoned in fertility clinics numbers in the hundreds of thousands, while the
number of embryos that have been killed to extract their stem cells numbers in
the hundreds. Yet much more effort is expended fighting embryonic stem cell
research than opposing fertility clinics. We have never seen any coverage in the
media of pro-lifers
picketing fertility clinics. The balance seems to be way off.
The main pro-life efforts have been aimed at reducing or
eliminating the production of embryonic stem cells, and limiting women's access to:

Reference used:
The following information source was used to prepare and update the above
essay. The hyperlink is not necessarily still active today.
- "Intra-Uterine Device," Sex-Ed 101; Hoboken Family Planning,
at:
http://www.sex-ed101.com/

Site navigation:

Copyright © 2002 to 2010 by Ontario Consultants on Religious
Tolerance
Originally written: 2002-SEP-25
Latest update: 2010-JAN-18
Author: B.A. Robinson

Sponsored link

|