About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitor essays
Our forum
New essays
Other site features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
.
CHRISTIANITY
Who is a Christian?
Shared beliefs
Handle change
Bible topics
Bible inerrancy
Bible harmony
Interpret Bible
Persons
Beliefs, creeds
Da Vinci code
Revelation, 666
Denominations
.
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Other spirituality
Cults and NRMs
Comparing religions

About all religions
Important topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handle change
Doubt/security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
World's end
One true religion?
Seasonal topics
Science v. Religion
More info.

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality/ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten commandm'ts
Abortion
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment
Equal rights - gays & bi's
Gay marriage
Nudism
Origins of the species
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Web site logo

What must one do to be saved?

How conservative Protestants (and two
other sources) interpret Matthew 25:34-45

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

Matthew 25:34-45 contains the sheep and goats passage that discusses Jesus' judgment of "all nations."

horizontal rule

What do the Christian Scriptures (New Testament) say about salvation?

As noted in this section's menu on salvation, the Bible contains many conflicting passages about how a person becomes saved. For example:

bulletSalvation is by faith only.
bulletSalvation is by works and faith.
bulletSalvation is by works only.
bulletSalvation is by faith motivated by love.
bulletSalvation is obtained through baptism.

Fundamentalist and other Evangelical Christians generally teach that one is "born-again" and saved:

bulletBy first repenting of one's sins, and then trust Jesus as Lord and Savior, OR,
bulletBy only trusting in Jesus as Lord and Savior. Repentance is not needed. Their rationale is that repenting of one's sins is an action -- a good work -- and salvation is dependent only upon faith, not on good works.

Either way, they believe that salvation is determined by faith, not works. This belief is supported by many of the writings of Paul and other authors of the Christian Scriptures. But many passages in the synoptic gospels (Mark, Matthew and Luke) seem to teach that the reverse is true. Harmonizing these passages to teach a consistent message is difficult. Matthew 25:34-45 is one of the most difficult to harmonize with a "faith not works" belief system because it is so clear and explicit.

horizontal rule

Considering Matthew 25:34-45:

Many interpret Matthew 25:31-45 as a description of the Last Judgment (sometimes called the "Day of the Lord"). It involves Jesus judging every human who has ever lived in order to decide their eternal destiny. Christianity seems to have adopted this concept from earlier Jewish belief. The Jews, in turn, appear to have obtained it from Zoroastrians at the time of their Babylonian captivity during the 6th century BCE.

A casual reading of this passage seems to suggest that:

Everyone, the population of "all nations," will be gathered before Jesus. He will separate out those who are saved (the sheep). They are destined to live for eternity in Heaven. The sheep are people who had been compassionate towards others: feeding the hungry and thirsty; supporting strangers; giving needy people clothing; nursing them to health; and visiting inmates in prison. The rest -- the goats -- are not saved. They were not compassionate towards the needy while they lived on earth. They will spend eternity in the torture pit of Hell.

horizontal rule

Alternate interpretations of Matthew 25:34-45:

The obvious interpretation of this passage is that Jesus will gather everyone who has ever lived and judge each person individually on the basis of their good works while they were on earth. That analysis is unacceptable to all or essentially all Fundamentalist and other Evangelical Christians. Based on other passages in the Bible, they believe that only those who are "born-again" while alive on Earth have been saved. Only they will attain Heaven. A person's salvation is totally dependent on one's faith, not works. Trusting Jesus as Lord and Savior does lead naturally to good works, but that happens after the individual is saved, Works have impact on Jesus' decision whether to send the person to Heaven or Hell.

In order to harmonize Matthew 25:34-45 with their beliefs, some Evangelicals interpret the phrase "all nations" as not including the entire human race; rather, it represents a much smaller group. Others deny that the selection is really based on good works, as a casual reading would indicate. Still others interpret the poor and needy as initially referring to the twelve disciples, and now to Christian evangelists.

horizontal rule

Some alternative interpretations from text books:

We scanned many Evangelical Christian dictionaries of theology, Bible handbooks, Bible commentaries, etc. and found that many did not refer to this passage in Matthew. Those that did mention this passage came up with various alternate interpretations that allow them to retain their belief in salvation by faith, not works:

bulletThe "New Commentary on the Whole Bible" suggested that the gathering of "all nations" before Jesus actually refers only to the world's non-Christians who survived the catastrophic events of the battle of Armageddon and the end of the world as we know it. Also, the "least of these my brethren" consist only of the Jewish population. Thus, this final judgment involves only non-Christians, and is made on the basis of their previous treatment of Jews.

These commentators note that Heaven is restricted to only those persons who were saved while on earth -- i.e. born-again Christians. Thus, "the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world" in which these non-Christians will spend eternity cannot be the regular Heaven. It must be some sort of inferior version. 1 Or perhaps Heaven has a two tier citizenry something like the American South during the days of segregation. Those who were saved will receive full benefits; those who were not saved but who did a sufficient number of good works while on earth will receive an inferior set of benefits.
bulletHarold Willmington's "Bible Handbook" disagrees. It states that this passage describes the Last Judgment when all humans will be evaluated. However, "...good works are not the basis but the proof of salvation." 2 That is, the separation of all humans into sheep and goats is not directly related to their works, as the text seems to say. Rather it is fundamentally based on whether the individual was saved or not. The implication appears to be that:
bulletChristians who are saved during their life on earth are righteous; they would have performed good works by being kind to those in need.
bulletThose who are unsaved nominal Christians or followers of other religions or followers of no religions are all callous individuals who treated the needy without care or compassion.

That is, only born-again Christians follow the Golden Rule by being considerate of others -- a somewhat chauvinistic belief.

Separating the sheep from the goats on the basis of good works would then produce the same results as separating them on the basis their salvation status status. This interpretation takes a very dim view of the behavior of hundreds of millions of unsaved Christians, the millions of members of non-Christian religions, and the many tens of millions of persons unaffiliated with any religion in North America.

This interpretation does not appear to correspond with public opinion polls. All of the major religions teach a version of the Golden Rule. Our experience as a multi-faith group is that those who do not identify themselves as members of an organized religion or who are non-Christians or are non-saved Christians are as caring as born-again Christians. Thus, separating humans according to their behavior towards others would result in many born-again Christians going to Hell and many of the others going to Heaven.

bulletThe New Jerome Biblical Commentary agrees that the crowd gathered before Jesus "refers to all nations, Israel included, not just the Gentiles." They further state that this passage has been:

"...overinterpreted to say that neither faith in Christ nor membership in the church is necessary for salvation, but in fact, it is addressed to Christian disciples and discipleship is understood in a very bold way as identical with care of the needy. This is not a denial of faith; it is the essence of faith." 3

bulletA mainline Christian resource, Harper's Bible Commentary, states that "all nations" actually refers only to the Christian church i.e.  "...those who have been made his disciples as a result of the church's mission." Although the writers do not say so, this implies that some who have become disciples of Christ and are in the Church will actually be sent to Hell for eternal torture because of their lack of good works. 4

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

Some alternative interpretations from the Internet:

The Internet is a rich source of interpretations of this passage. We studied five Evangelical and one Roman Catholic web site.

bulletSome hold the rather chauvinistic belief that all born-again Christians follow the Golden Rule and are compassionate towards the needy, while all who are not born-again Christians take a calloused attitude towards the disadvantaged and ignore their suffering.
bulletBoston Christian Bible Study Resources states:
"what Matt[hew] 25 brings out is the correlation between one's salvation status and one's behavior. Is this teaching salvation by works? Indeed we might come to that conclusion if we hadn't read the rest of the Bible. In reality what happens is that those who have been born of God naturally love the children of God. This is not performance based salvation, but salvation based performance. One's works are an effect of (and therefore indication of) one's salvation status, rather than being a cause of one's salvation." 6
bulletBible.org writes that:
"... works are the fruit that demonstrates the reality of the conversion of one's heart. The love shown by these deeds of mercy springs from true faith. As Walvoord affirms, 'What is presented here is not the basis or ground of salvation but the evidence of it. Accordingly, while works are not the ground of justification for salvation, they can be the fruit or evidence of it.' ... it is clear from this parable that they are judged by their works and sent to hell for not having the works - which represent faith..." 8
bulletBible Tools writes
"... the sheep have love through a regular infusion of the Spirit of God. ... A godly life always comes down to the basic things. The sheep are simply unconsciously and unaffectedly good, kind, sympathetic, and concerned, attributes of character that cannot be feigned. 10

The implication is that the unsaved -- the goats -- have none of these fine qualities.
 

bulletOther web sites suggest a different interpretation. They assert that the phrase "these my brethren" does not refer to all of the disenfranchised, hungry, naked, sick, and/or imprisoned people of the world. Rather, they initially consisted of only the twelve disciples that Jesus selected in the first century CE to assist him in his ministry. In the 21st century, Jesus' "brethren" would be all those who evangelize; the sheep are those who accept the Gospel, accept Jesus into their hearts, and are saved.
bulletXenos Christian Fellowship does admit that this passage is "...a challenge to interpret." At first glance, it seems to teach that one can work one's way to Heaven through good works. This conflicts with many other passages where Paul and other authors stress that we are saved through faith, not works. Galatians 2:16 and Ephesians 2:8-9 are two examples. Xenos continues:
"Good works (like the ones mentioned in Matthew 25) are a result of our salvation and not a condition for it (Ephesians 2:8-10). For this reason, no matter how important caring for the needy is, it plays no part whatever in our salvation." 7

Jesus is here referring to how people of all nations responded to the twelve disciples as they spread out around the world teaching the gospel to countless Jews and Pagans during the middle of the 1st century CE. Some of the public accepted the message, and are considered sheep; others rejected it and are goats.

bulletBible Gateway writes:
"In the context of Jesus' teachings, especially in the context of Matthew, ... this parable addresses not serving all the poor but receiving the gospel's messengers. ... [Jesus] thus judges the nations based on how they have responded to the gospel of the kingdom already preached to them before the time of his kingdom. 9
bulletLooking at the Roman Catholic perspective, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has a web site featuring the New American Bible translation. A footnote to Matthew 25 acknowledges that:
"A difficult and important question is the identification of these least brothers. Are they all people who have suffered hunger, thirst, etc. ... or a particular group of such sufferers? Scholars are divided in their response and arguments can be made for either side. But leaving aside the problem of what the traditional material that Matthew edited may have meant, it seems that a stronger case can be made for the view that in the evangelist's sense the sufferers are Christians, probably Christian missionaries whose sufferings were brought upon them by their preaching of the gospel. The criterion of judgment for all the nations is their treatment of those who have borne to the world the message of Jesus, and this means ultimately their acceptance or rejection of Jesus himself ..." 11

This is the only commentary among the many that we studied that suggests that there may be more than one possible interpretation of this passage.

horizontal rule

Reference used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. Philip Comfort, Ed., "New Commentary on the Whole Bible," Tyndale House, (1990), Page 89-90.

  2. Harold Willmington, "Bible Handbook," Tyndale House, (1997), Page 544.

  3. Raymond Brown, et al., "The New Jerome Biblical Commentary," Geoffrey Chapman, (1990), Page 669.

  4. "Harper's Bible Commentary," Harper and Row, (1988), Page 977.

  5. Charles Laymon, Ed., "The Interpreter's One-Volume Commentary on the Bible," Abingdon Press, (1971), Page 639 - 640.

  6. Boston Christian Bible Study Resources, "Matthew 25's Sheep/Goat Judgment," at: http://www.bcbsr.com/

  7. Gary DeLashmutt, "Jesus' Parable of the The Sheep & Goats: Matthew 25: 31-46," Xenos Christian Fellowship, (2001), at: http://www.xenos.org/

  8. Hampton Keathley IV , Th.M., "The Parables in the Olivet Discourse (Matthew 25)," Bible.org, at: http://www.bible.org/

  9. "Commentaries: The division of the sheep and the goats," Bible Gateway, at: http://www.biblegateway.com/

  10. "Commentaries: Matthew 25:31-46," Bible Tools, at: http://bibletools.org/

  11. "New American Bible: Matthew Chapter 25," United States Conference of Catholic Bishops," at: http://www.nccbuscc.org/

horizontal rule

Site navigation:

or Home > Christianity > Christian themes > Beliefs > Salvation > here

Home > Christianity > History, Beliefs, etc, > Beliefs > Cardinal beliefs > Salvation > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2006 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2006-AUG-26
Latest update: 2006-AUG-26
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)

horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or to the Salvation menu, or choose:

horizontal rule

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?