How conservative Protestants (and two
other sources) interpret Matthew 25:34-45
Sponsored link.
Matthew 25:34-45 contains the sheep and goats passage that
discusses Jesus' judgment of "all nations."
What do the Christian Scriptures (New Testament) say about salvation?
As noted in this section's menu on salvation, the
Bible contains many conflicting passages about how a person becomes saved. For
example:
Salvation is by faith only.
Salvation is by works and faith.
Salvation is by works only.
Salvation is by faith motivated by love.
Salvation is obtained through baptism.
Fundamentalist and other Evangelical Christians generally teach that one is "born-again" and saved:
By first repenting of one's sins, and then trust Jesus as Lord and Savior,
OR,
By only trusting in Jesus as Lord and Savior.
Repentance is not needed. Their rationale is that repenting of one's sins is
an action -- a good work -- and salvation is dependent only
upon faith, not on good works.
Either way, they believe that salvation is determined by faith, not works.
This belief is supported by many of the writings of Paul and other authors of
the Christian Scriptures. But many passages in the
synoptic gospels (Mark, Matthew and Luke) seem to teach that the reverse is
true. Harmonizing these passages to teach a consistent message is difficult.
Matthew 25:34-45 is one of the most difficult to harmonize with a "faith not
works" belief system because it is so clear and explicit.
Considering Matthew 25:34-45:
Many interpret Matthew 25:31-45 as a
description of the Last Judgment (sometimes called the "Day of the Lord").
It involves Jesus judging every human who has ever lived
in order to decide their eternal destiny. Christianity seems to have adopted this concept from
earlier
Jewish belief. The Jews, in turn, appear to have obtained it from
Zoroastrians at the time of their Babylonian
captivity during the 6th century
BCE.
A casual reading of this passage seems to suggest that:
Everyone, the population of "all nations,"
will be gathered before Jesus. He will separate out those who
are saved (the sheep). They are destined to live for eternity in
Heaven.
The sheep are people who had been compassionate towards
others: feeding the hungry and thirsty; supporting strangers; giving needy
people clothing; nursing them to health; and visiting inmates in prison. The rest
--
the goats -- are not saved. They were not compassionate towards the needy while
they lived on earth. They will spend eternity in the torture pit of Hell.
Alternate interpretations of Matthew 25:34-45:
The obvious interpretation of this passage is that Jesus will gather everyone
who has ever lived and judge each person individually on the basis of their good
works while they were on earth. That analysis is unacceptable to all or
essentially all Fundamentalist and other Evangelical Christians. Based on other
passages in the Bible, they believe that only those who are "born-again" while
alive on Earth have been saved. Only they will attain Heaven. A person's
salvation is totally dependent on one's faith, not works. Trusting Jesus as Lord
and Savior does lead naturally to good works, but that happens after the
individual is saved, Works have impact on Jesus' decision whether to send the
person to Heaven or Hell.
In order to harmonize Matthew 25:34-45 with their beliefs, some Evangelicals
interpret the phrase "all nations" as not including the entire human
race; rather, it represents a much smaller group. Others deny that the selection
is really based on good works, as a casual reading would indicate. Still others
interpret the poor and needy as initially referring to the twelve disciples, and
now to Christian evangelists.
Some alternative interpretations from text books:
We scanned many Evangelical Christian dictionaries of theology, Bible
handbooks, Bible commentaries, etc. and found that many did not refer to this
passage in Matthew. Those that did mention this passage came up with various
alternate interpretations that allow them to retain their belief in salvation by
faith, not works:
The "New Commentary on the Whole Bible" suggested that the gathering of "all nations" before
Jesus actually refers only to the world's non-Christians who survived the
catastrophic events of the battle of Armageddon and the end of the
world as we know it. Also, the "least of these my brethren" consist
only of the Jewish population. Thus, this final judgment involves only non-Christians,
and is made on the basis of their previous treatment of Jews.
These commentators note that Heaven is restricted to only those persons who
were saved while on earth -- i.e. born-again Christians. Thus,
"the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world"
in which these non-Christians will spend eternity cannot be the regular
Heaven. It must be some sort of inferior version. 1 Or perhaps Heaven
has a
two tier citizenry something like the American South during the days of segregation. Those who were saved will receive full benefits;
those who were not saved but who did a sufficient number of good works while on earth will receive an inferior set of benefits.
Harold Willmington's "Bible Handbook"disagrees. It
states that this passage describes the Last Judgment when all humans will be
evaluated. However, "...good works are not the basis but the proof of salvation."
2
That is, the separation of all humans into sheep and goats is not directly related to their works, as the text seems to say. Rather
it is fundamentally based on whether the individual was saved or not. The implication appears to be that:
Christians who are saved during their life on earth are righteous; they would have performed good works by being kind to those in need.
Those who are unsaved nominal Christians or followers of other religions or
followers of no religions are all callous individuals who treated the needy without
care or compassion.
That is, only born-again Christians follow the Golden Rule by being considerate of others
-- a somewhat chauvinistic belief.
Separating the sheep from the goats on the basis of good works would then
produce the same results as separating them on the basis their salvation
status status. This
interpretation takes a very dim view of the behavior of hundreds of millions of unsaved Christians,
the millions of members of non-Christian religions, and the many tens of
millions of persons unaffiliated with any religion in North America.
This interpretation does not appear to correspond with public opinion
polls. All of the major religions
teach a version of the Golden Rule. Our experience as a multi-faith
group is that those who do not identify themselves as members of an organized
religion or who are non-Christians or are non-saved Christians are as caring as born-again Christians.
Thus, separating humans according to their behavior towards others would
result in many born-again Christians going to Hell and many of the others going to
Heaven.
The New Jerome Biblical Commentary agrees that the crowd gathered
before Jesus "refers to all nations, Israel included, not just the
Gentiles." They further state that this passage has been:
"...overinterpreted to say that neither faith in Christ nor
membership in the church is necessary for salvation, but in fact, it is
addressed to Christian disciples and discipleship is understood in a
very bold way as identical with care of the needy. This is not a denial
of faith; it is the essence of faith." 3
A mainline Christian resource, Harper's Bible Commentary, states
that "all nations" actually refers only to the Christian church i.e.
"...those who have been made his disciples as a result of the church's
mission." Although the writers do not say so, this implies that some who
have become disciples of Christ and are in the Church will actually be sent
to Hell for eternal torture because of their lack of good works. 4
Sponsored link:
Some alternative interpretations from the Internet:
The Internet is a rich source of interpretations of this passage. We studied
five Evangelical and one Roman Catholic web site.
Some hold the rather chauvinistic belief that all born-again Christians follow the
Golden Rule and are compassionate towards the needy,
while all who are not born-again Christians take a calloused attitude towards the disadvantaged and ignore
their suffering.
Boston Christian Bible Study Resources states:
"what Matt[hew] 25 brings out is the correlation between one's salvation
status and one's behavior. Is this teaching salvation by works? Indeed
we might come to that conclusion if we hadn't read the rest of the
Bible. In reality what happens is that those who have been born of God
naturally love the children of God. This is not performance based
salvation, but salvation based performance. One's works are an effect of
(and therefore indication of) one's salvation status, rather than being
a cause of one's salvation." 6
Bible.org writes that:
"... works are the fruit that demonstrates the reality of the conversion of one's heart. The love shown by these deeds
of mercy springs from true faith. As Walvoord affirms, 'What is presented here is not the basis or ground of salvation but the evidence
of it. Accordingly, while works are not the ground of justification for salvation, they can be the fruit or evidence of it.' ... it is
clear from this parable that they are judged by their works and sent to hell for not having the works - which represent faith..."
8
Bible Tools writes
"... the sheep have love through a regular infusion of the Spirit of
God. ... A godly life always comes down to the basic things. The sheep are
simply unconsciously and unaffectedly good, kind, sympathetic, and
concerned, attributes of character that cannot be feigned. 10
The implication is that the unsaved -- the goats -- have none of these fine
qualities.
Other web sites
suggest a different interpretation. They assert that the phrase "these my brethren"
does not refer to all of the disenfranchised, hungry, naked, sick, and/or
imprisoned people of the world. Rather, they initially consisted of only the
twelve disciples that Jesus selected in the first century CE
to assist him in his ministry. In the 21st century, Jesus' "brethren"
would be all those who evangelize; the sheep are those
who accept the Gospel, accept Jesus into their hearts, and are saved.
Xenos Christian Fellowship does admit that this passage is "...a
challenge to interpret." At first glance, it seems to teach that one
can work one's way to Heaven through good works. This conflicts with many other
passages where Paul and other authors stress that we are saved through faith, not works. Galatians 2:16 and Ephesians
2:8-9 are two examples. Xenos continues:
"Good works (like the ones mentioned in Matthew 25) are a
result of
our salvation and not a condition for it (Ephesians 2:8-10). For this
reason, no matter how important caring for the needy is, it plays no part
whatever in our salvation." 7
Jesus is here referring to how people of
all nations responded to the twelve disciples as they spread out around the world
teaching the gospel to countless Jews and Pagans during the middle of the 1st
century CE. Some of the public accepted the message, and
are considered sheep; others rejected it and are goats.
Bible Gateway writes:
"In the context of Jesus' teachings, especially in the context of Matthew,
... this parable addresses not serving all the poor but receiving the gospel's
messengers. ... [Jesus] thus judges the nations based on how they have responded
to the gospel of the kingdom already preached to them before the time of his
kingdom. 9
Looking at the Roman Catholic perspective, the United States Conference of
Catholic Bishops has a web site featuring the New American Bible
translation. A footnote to Matthew 25 acknowledges that:
"A difficult and important question is the identification of these
least brothers. Are they all people who have suffered hunger, thirst, etc.
... or a particular group of such sufferers? Scholars are divided in their
response and arguments can be made for either side. But leaving aside the
problem of what the traditional material that Matthew edited may have meant,
it seems that a stronger case can be made for the view that in the
evangelist's sense the sufferers are Christians, probably Christian
missionaries whose sufferings were brought upon them by their preaching of
the gospel. The criterion of judgment for all the nations is their treatment
of those who have borne to the world the message of Jesus, and this means
ultimately their acceptance or rejection of Jesus himself ..." 11
This is the only commentary among the many that we studied that suggests that
there may be more than one possible interpretation of this passage.
Reference used:
The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above
essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.
Philip Comfort, Ed., "New Commentary on the Whole Bible,"
Tyndale House, (1990), Page 89-90.
Harold Willmington, "Bible Handbook," Tyndale House,
(1997), Page 544.
Raymond Brown, et al., "The New Jerome Biblical
Commentary," Geoffrey Chapman, (1990), Page 669.
"Harper's Bible Commentary," Harper and Row, (1988),
Page 977.
Charles Laymon, Ed., "The Interpreter's One-Volume
Commentary on the Bible," Abingdon Press, (1971), Page 639 - 640.
Boston Christian Bible Study Resources, "Matthew 25's Sheep/Goat
Judgment," at:
http://www.bcbsr.com/
Gary DeLashmutt, "Jesus' Parable of the The Sheep & Goats:
Matthew 25: 31-46," Xenos Christian Fellowship, (2001), at:
http://www.xenos.org/
Hampton Keathley IV , Th.M., "The Parables in the Olivet
Discourse (Matthew 25)," Bible.org, at:
http://www.bible.org/