Quantcast


Twitter icon


Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our statement of belief
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' donated essays
Our forum
New essays
Other site features
Hot, controversial topics
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
Definition of Christianity
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Bible Interpreting
 Individuals in the Bible
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation & 666
 Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA & Witchcraft
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Compare Faiths

Non-theistic beliefs
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods and Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science/Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
10 Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment/Climate change

Gay marriages

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Same-Sex marriages
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women's rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Religious Tolerance logo

Same-sex marriages come to Idaho.

2014-NOV & 2015-MAR:
Part 6 of 6: Hitching Post Wedding Chapel:
The Chapel's and city's dispute is transferred
to federal court. Current status of the conflict.
horizontal rule

This topic is continued from the previous page.

horizontal rule

The term "LGBT" is a widely used acronym for the Lesbian,
Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender/Transsexual community.

horizontal rule

wedding rings2015-MAR: Negotiations between the Hitching Post and the city broke down (Continued):

The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) a legal defense group who is representing the owners of the Hitching Post has stated that city officials:

"... need to clarify who the law applies to and who it doesn’t. You’ve got a criminal law that allows for jail time and fines. It cannot be vague. People can’t be left guessing whether they will be subject to the ordinance." 1

This statement seems confusing because:

  • The city's human rights ordinance clearly states that religious organizations are exempt from the ordinance and are free to discriminate in any way that they wish.

  • The Hitching Post Wedding Chapel was registered as a religious organization before marriage equality came to Idaho in late 2014..

State Senator Steve Vick (R) commented:

"It’s very disappointing to me that they would require a Christian business owner to do something that violates their religious convictions, which I believe are protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Most of the reaction that I incurred has been from disappointment to shock that [the city] would do that." 1

Fortunately, the city did not do that. It appears that:

  • No same-sex couple has asked the Chapel to marry them.

  • No complaint has been filed with the city by any same-sex couple who has been refused service by the Chapel.

  • The city has not ordered the owners of the Chapel to marry same-sex couples.

  • The Chapel is exempt from the human rights legislation.

But even if the Post is considered to be a for-profit public accommodation, as we stated previously in this section, the resolution to the conflict appears to be obvious. The Hitching Post could simply arrange in advance to have a member of the clergy -- or any other person licensed by the state to solemnize marriages -- on call to come to the Hitching Post and perform any marriage ceremonies that the owners don't want to do themselves. Co-owner Donald Knapp had earlier indicated that this compromise was acceptable to himself and his wife.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

2015-JUL-01: Catholic World News comments on the lawsuit filed by the Hitching Post chapel:

This information service makes a number of points:

  • The City Attorney told the Chapel owners that they could face prosecution if they refuse to marry same-sex couples.

  • The "local non-discrimination ordinance" would require the owners of the Chapel "to provide equal service for homosexuals."

  • If the city ordinance were enforced the chapel owners' religious freedom would be violated.

  • City officials say that the Chapel is registered as a for-profit corporation.

  • The city is treating the Chapel as a public accommodation. 2

That is a total of 5 points, none of which seem to correspond with reality.

horizontal rule

2015-JUL-20: Hearing held in federal District Court:

A hearing was held by the U.S. District Court in Idaho involving the dispute between the Hitching Post Chapel and the City of Coeur d'Alene. U.S. Magistrate Judge Ronald Bush presided.

  • According to an article by KTVB-TV, Alliance Defending Freedom attorney Matt Sharp, who is acting for the the Chapel owners, claims that the city human rights ordinance requires the Chapel to perform gay marriages.

  • According to Keith Erickson, spokesperson for the City, the lawsuit should be dismissed because the chapel is registered as a religious organization. This makes them immune to charges under the same ordinance.

The District Court is expected to issue its ruling during August. 3

horizontal rule

2015-JUL-28: Current status of the Wedding Chapel dispute:

As far as we know as of the date of the most recent update to this essay:

  • According to the American Civil Liberties Union, the Hitching Post Wedding Chapel is registered as a religious organization and thus is free do discriminate against couples seeking to be married on any basis it wishes -- even on the basis of their eye color or hair style -- with impunity.

  • Total number of complaints lodged by same-sex couples against the Chapel: zero

  • Total fines paid by the Chapel owners to date: zero

  • Total time spent in jail by the Chapel owners: zero days, zero hours.

  • Effect that this publicity has had on the profit made by the Hitching Post: Unknown. However, some business owners across the U.S. who have refused to serve LGBT customers for religious reasons have experienced a rapid increase in sales afterwards from customers who oppose marriage equality.

  • Amount of increased donations to the Alliance Defending Freedom from donors fearing that their faith group will be ordered to perform gay marriages in the near future, as a result of the imaginary conflict: Unknown.

  • Total number of clergy in an American church, mosque, synagogue, etc. who have been charged during the past few centuries for refusing to marrying a couple because they were interracial, black, of the "wrong" religion, of the "right" religion but the "wrong" denomination, of the same sex, or too immature, etc.: zero.

Our predictions for the future:

  • Future chances that a member of the clergy who works for a religious congregation being charged for refusing to marry a same-sex couple: zero.

  • Probability that conservative religious media outlets will violate the 9th of the 10 Commandments in the future ("Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.") and claim that clergy are at risk for arrest or fine based on discrimination against the LGBT community: near 100%.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

Further developments may or may not materialize.

In the meantime, same-sex couples continue to freely marry in Idaho,
the Hitching Post Chapel remains immune from prosecution by the city,
and most or all of the inaccuracies in reports on the Internet about the
Hitching Post Chapel remain uncorrected. People deserve better.

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. Bob Unruh, " 'Gay weddings' mandate gets new Judgment Day," WND Faith, 2015-MAR-08, at: http://www.wnd.com/
  2. "Idaho 'wedding chapel' files suit to block enforcement of ordinance requiring same-sex ceremonies," Catholic World News, 2015-JUL--01, at: https://www.catholicculture.org/
  3. "Court hears dismissal arguments in Idaho wedding chapel case," KTVB-TV, 2015-JUL-21, at: http://www.ktvb.com/

Site navigation: Home > Homosexuality > Same-sex marriage > Menu > Idaho > here

Copyright © 2014 & 2015 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance 
Originally written: 2015-JUL-28
Latest update: 2015-JUL-28
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

Go to the previous page, or return to the "Latta v. Otter' case in Idaho" menu, or  choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Hot, controversial topics

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

 
Sponsored links