Sponsored links
|
Thus, in theory, individual Anglican and Catholic dioceses, and individual Catholic orders are in the most exposed financial situation. Even a small number of abuse claims could force each of them in to bankruptcy, unless the government steps in with funding. However, in practice, the federal government has been involving The General Synod of the Anglican Church by third party action. By 2001-MAR, this had happened in 386 cases. Similarly, the government has been involving Roman Catholic dioceses in abuse trials, even though residential schools in their area were operated by separately incorporated Orders within the church.
Sponsored link:
Lawsuits:Both the government and the above mentioned religious institutions have been hit by class-action lawsuits totaling over a billion dollars (CDN) alleging various forms of abuse in church-run native residential schools. A total of about 7,000 survivors of these schools are currently suing the federal government and the religious organizations directly responsible for their inhumane treatment. The eventual number of plaintiffs will probably exceed 10,000. In addition to allegations of personal abuse, many of of the claims are based on the children's separation from their family of origin, and their loss of aboriginal culture. These latter two types claims are new to the courts and have not been tested. In 1996, the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples recommended that a public inquiry be made into residential schools. This was ignored by the government. Matthew Coon Come, Grand Chief of the Assembly of First Nations, has called for a Canadian version of the Apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission that facilitated healing in South Africa. 3 Some Native victims of abuse would be satisfied by an apology from their perpetrator(s) through the offices of such a Commission. Others who are too frail in mind or body to tackle a court battle might welcome it as well.Lawsuits are generally slow moving, exhausting for the plaintiffs, and expensive. Lawyers seem to be the main benefactors in many cases. During 1998 and 1999, the federal government hosted a series of discussions to seek alternatives to litigation. Present were some First Nation survivors, civil servants, and church representatives. As a result of this dialog, twelve pilot projects in alternative dispute resolution were agreed to. These programs were limited in their scope and in the number of survivors who could participate." 3
References used:
Copyright © 2000 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
|
Sponsored link:
|