|
As of 1999-APR, privately-funded voucher programs were available in at least 39 American cities. The largest, funded by John Walton and Ted Forstmann, was scheduled to award scholarships of up to $1,600 to 40,000 low-income students across the U.S. However, even though the Cleveland model is compatible with the U.S. federal constitution, similar voucher systems are still prohibited in many states because they conflict with those states' constitutions. Analyst Dick Carpenter of the fundamentalist Christian group, Focus on the Family, said that individual states present different challenges. He said:
Experience with pilot studies:Pilot studies were conducted in Milwaukee, WI and Cleveland, OH during the late 1990s. As noted above, voucher parents are more pleased with the academic quality of their children's schools than are parents of children in public schools. Indiana University researchers found that the average class size in private schools was smaller but that the teachers in public schools had better credentials and greater experience. The researchers concluded that the two effects cancelled each other out. Voucher-assisted students did better in fourth-grade academic achievement tests in language and science, but the differences were "relatively small." In other tests, reading, math, social studies and "total battery," there was no difference between public and voucher students.
Florida:The Florida voucher plan closely matches the national plan that was promoted by President George W. Bush. Florida Governor Jeb Bush signed a statewide voucher bill, the Opportunity Scholarship Program, into law on 1999-JUN-21. It gave vouchers of up to $3,389 a year, but only to children who attended schools which the state evaluated as failures. A school rating of "F" for two out of four years on the annual Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test would entitle the parents of that schools' students to receive vouchers. When the program began in 1999-AUG, students in only two schools were eligible; both are in Pensacola. 3 It is surprising that Florida's legislature would pass a voucher law that could be used to fund education in a religiously-based private school. The state Constitution clearly states, "[N]o revenue of the state or any political subdivision or agency thereof shall ever be taken from the public treasury directly or indirectly in aid of any church, sect or religious denomination or in aid of any sectarian institution." While the Florida law would not divert funds from the government directly to religious schools, it would do so indirectly, through parents. A coalition of groups, including the Florida PTA, League of Women Voters, teacher's unions and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People successfully challenged the funding scheme in court. The law was declared unconstitutional by Leon County Circuit Court Judge L. Ralph Smith, Jr. on 2000-MAR-14. He based his decision largely on Article IX Section 1 of the Florida constitution which requires the school to provide free education through public schools. It declares:
According to the People For the American Way Foundation:
Leon Russell, spokesperson for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People in Florida commented:
Bob Chase, President of the National Education Association said:
Governor J. Bush promises to keep the program running, by raising private funding. He characterized Judge Smith's decision as "the first inning of a long, drawn-out legal battle." Governor Bush intends to appeal the court ruling aggressively. Judge Smith ordered that the 53 children who took advantage of vouchers will be allowed to finish their school year before returning to the public school for their 2000-2001 academic year. In 2002-AUG, a state judge ruled that Florida's Opportunity Scholarships was unconstitutional under the state's constitution. The ruling was based on the prohibition of government funding going directly or indirectly to religious organizations.
Public opinion polls:Phi Delta Kappa and the Gallup Organization have conducted seven polls on school vouchers between 1993 and 2000. Unfortunately, the main question is poorly worded, because it lumps together current voucher proposals which only cover a portion of private school tuition with the concept of the state paying 100% of tuition. In addition, it does not differentiate between religious and secular private schools. "Do you favor or oppose allowing students and parents to choose a private school to attend at public expense."
Additional data:
When the year 2000 results were announced on 2000-AUG-21, Brent Walker, Executive Director of the Baptist Joint Committee said that the survey "indicates that the American public is seeing through the misguided arguments of the pro-voucher forces." 7
References used:The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.
Copyright © 2000 to 2006 by Ontario Consultants on Religious
Tolerance
|
|