| About this site |
| About us |
| Our beliefs |
| Your first visit? |
| Contact us |
| External links |
| Good books |
| Visitors' essays |
| Our forum |
| New essays |
| Other features |
| Buy a CD |
| Vital notes |
| Non-theistic... |
| Atheism |
| Agnosticism |
| Humanism |
| Other |
| About all religions |
| Main topics |
| Basic info. |
| Gods/Goddesses |
| Handling change |
| Doubt/security |
| Quotes |
| Movies |
| Confusing terms |
| Glossary |
| World's end |
| True religion? |
| Seasonal events |
| Science/Religion |
| More info. |
| Spiritual/ethics |
| Spirituality |
| Morality/ethics |
| Absolute truth |
| Peace/conflict |
| Attaining peace |
| Relig. tolerance |
| Relig. freedom |
| Relig. hatred |
| Relig. conflict |
| Relig. violence |
| Laws and news |
| Religious laws |
| Religious news |
|
Separation of church and state issuesMenuMunicipalities' and states' use of
|
 | "Americans are being denied the right to express their religious speech
in the public square." Ralph Reed, Christian Coalition. |
| "There is no such source and cause of strife, quarrel, fights. malignant opposition, persecution, and war, and all evil in the state, as religion. Let it once enter our civil affairs, our government would soon be destroyed. Let it once enter our common schools, they would be destroyed." - Supreme Court of Wisconsin, Weiss v. District Board, 1890-MAR-18. |
Overview:
The 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as interpreted by the courts, guarantees that:
| individuals have freedom of religious expression and practice; |
| the government and its agencies will not recognize one religious faith as more valid than any other faith; |
| the government and its agencies will not promote religion above secularism or vice versa. |
These principles are continuously in a state of creative tension:
| Many Americans feel that America was founded by Christians and remains a Christian nation, since about 75% of its population regard themselves as Christians. They would like to see their religion represented in municipal religious displays, etc. Any restrictions would be regarded as an infringement of their religious freedoms. Some would like to see all other religious excluded. |
| Other individuals, both Christian and non-Christian, are opposed to their municipal government or state using religious symbols, displays or phrases. They feel that a wall of separation must be maintained between religion and governments at all levels. They regard this factor as outweighing any personal religious considerations that they might have. Many feel that the relative lack of religiously-motivated violence in the U.S. -- compared to that seen in the rest of the world -- is due to this principle of separation. |
Topics covered in this section:
| Municipalities' use of religious displays: crosses, nativity scenes, etc.
| ||||
| Municipalities' use of religious symbols: in their crests & seals
| ||||
| State use of religious phrases: in their motto
|
Related essays:
| Separation of church and state issues |
| U.S. court rulings on separation of church and state |
| Organizations dealing with separation issues |
Links to web sites which deal with separation issues:
| "The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State," at: http://members.tripod.com/ is a web site that is totally devoted to this topic. |
| A site with a list of links to other Internet locations dealing with separation of church and state is at: http://members.tripod.com/ |
Site navigation:
|
Home page > Religious law > here |
|
or Home page > Religious law > Church-state separation > here |
Copyright © 1998 to 2005 by Ontario Consultants on
Religious Tolerance
Original publishing date: 1998-AUG-5
Latest update: 2005-DEC-18
Author: B.A. Robinson
|
|
|
Page Translator:Sponsored link: