Environmental concerns
Groups that are actively involved.

Sponsored link.

Overview:
To avert a catastrophe on an unimaginable scale, humanity must realize that
its approach to life and progress must change, and then change it. This will not
be done by politicians, technocrats, economists, or tame scientists in the pay
of giant international organizations. These people consider the necessary
changes to be against their short-sighted and short-term interests. Just
consider what EXXON, probably the biggest of the international companies, had to
say in one of its leaflets:
"Exxon Mobil Corporation is committed to being the world's premier
petroleum and petrochemical company. To that end, we must continuously
achieve financial and operating results while adhering to the highest
standards of business conduct. These unwavering expectations provide the
foundation for our commitments to those with whom we interact. We are
committed to enhancing the long-term value of the investment dollars
en-trusted to us by our shareholders. By running the business profitably and
responsibly we expect our shareholders to be rewarded with superior returns.
... This commitment drives the management of our company."
How many words on respecting nature does this statement contain?

Groups actively involved in environmental protection:
If not tame scientists, then who should take their place? There is an
impressive array of institutions and individuals who are aware that the
situation is bad, and are willing to do their best in trying to remedy it.
Growing awareness of environmental problems during the 1960s and 1970s led to
the formation of many active groups. Major environmental disasters, such as the
release of deadly gas from the Union Carbide plant at Bhopal, and the Chernobyl
nuclear reactor disaster, have placed ecological issues firmly on the political
agenda of most countries.
 | There is the Club of Rome, a global think tank, which is a
non-profit, non-governmental organization. It brings together scientists,
economists, businessmen, international high civil servants, heads of state,
and former heads of state, who are convinced that the future of humankind is
not determined once and for all, and that each human being can contribute to
the improvement of our societies. |
 | The analyses of the available scientific, technical, and socio-economic
information relevant for the understanding of the risk of human-induced
climate change are done by the International Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC). It incorporates the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO)
and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). The Panel collates
evidence relevant for the understanding of climate change, and works out
options for the mitigation of climate change effects. |
 | There is the Friends of the Earth movement (part of the
Stop
Climate Chaos coalition), which inspires solutions to environmental
problems. |
 | Among other institutions with an ecology program are the National
Resource Defense Council, the Climate Change Section from the
United Nations Environment Program, and the
Centre for Science and
Environment (based in Delhi). |
 | There are five UN-backed biodiversity related treaties: CBD, CITES, CMS,
Ramsar, and WHC. |
 | The World Conferences on Climate Change and Global Warming have
staged the Conferences of the Parties to the Convention (COP): COP1
in Berlin, COP2 in Geneva, COP3 in Kyoto (conference and protocol), COP4 in
Buenos Ayres, COP5 in Geneva, COP6 in The Hague/Bonn, COP7 in Marrakech,
COP8 in Delhi, COP9 in Milan, COP10 in Buenos Ayres, and COP11 in Montreal.
The best known is the Kyoto conference and protocol, which produced the
Kyoto Protocol (an international treaty on climate change setting
targets for industrial countries to cut their green-house gas emissions) -
only two major countries currently oppose the Kyoto Treaty: The USA (the
country responsible for about a quarter of the world's greenhouse gas
emissions) and Australia. The best-attended meeting was COP11 in Montreal,
that was attended by almost 10,000 delegates from more than 180 nations.
Note that US, Australia, China, India, Japan, and South Korea created, as an
alternative to COP3 Kyoto, the Asia-Pacific climate pact aimed at reducing
greenhouse gas emissions through technology and voluntary partnership. The
pact is toothless, not considering any mandatory reduction targets in order
to avoid any risk of economic pain. It has also been criticized as being
short in detail. The first meeting of the pact, scheduled to take place in
November, 2005 in Australia, has been postponed. |
 | It is claimed that big business is beginning to play an important role
in developing principles and practices for environmentally sensitive cost
accounting. So far, there is little proof of that, business aims are
contrary to those of the environmentalists. |
 | There are newspapers, such as the
Guardian that publishes special
reports on climate change, and magazines, such as
The Ecologist, that
are active in the ecology field. |
 | Extensive information on ecology is provided on the Internet. Among the
important sources are:
 | The OneWorld.net brings together more than 1,500
organizations from across the globe. |
 | The Third World Network (TWN)
has many articles providing a
very critical look at the role of big business and of such countries as
the US. |
 | The MediaChannel.org provides a critical look at how
environmental issues are covered (or not covered) by the media around
the world, and also serves as a link to a large collection of media
related articles. |
 | The Global Issues
web-site by Anup Shah looks into
biodiversity,
global
environmental issues, and provides links to external web sites,
articles, reports, and analyses. |
|

An apparent stealth group:
The Council of Republicans for
Environmental Advocacy (CREA) states that it:
"... is committed to preserving America’s natural resources, air,
water, and scenic beauty for future generations. CREA's mission is to foster
environmental protection by promoting fair, community-based solutions to
environmental challenges, highlighting Republican environmental
accomplishments and building on our Republican tradition of conservation."
Unfortunately, their main goals appear to be to:
 | Ridicule what they refer to as "excessive and intolerant" environmental
groups who are critical of the Republican administration's efforts on the
environment, and |
 | Advertise the efforts made by Republicans to help the environment. |
 | Give priority to the short-term preservation of jobs at the expense of
long term protection of the environment. |

Site navigation:

Copyright 2006 by Vladimir Tomek
Originally posted: 2006-JUN-25
Latest update: 2006-NOV-12
Author: Vladimir Tomek. Addition of CREA by B.A. Robinson



|