Twitter icon

Facebook icon

About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Vital notes

World religions
Christian def'n
Climate Change
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret the Bible
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Confusing terms
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Death penalty

Same-sex marriage

Human rights
Gays in the military
Sex & gender
Stem cells
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news



Religious Tolerance logo


2018-0CT/NOV: Trump
Administration Plans
to redefine gender ID
of Transgender Persons.
Reactions to the
President Trump's plan.

horizontal rule

This topic is continued here from the previous essay

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

2018-OCT-21: The Trump Administration's plan to eliminate recognition of U.S. transgender persons by a change of definition:

Mythili Sampathkumar, writing for The Independent newspaper in the UK said that the:

"... Trump administration is considering revoking civil rights protections for transgender people and requiring Americans to identify [themselves by] ... the gender listed on their birth certificates.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) outlined the proposed policy in a memo which stated gender would be determined by a “biological basis that is clear, grounded in science, objective, and administrable." 1

That is, for transgender persons, the government will define their gender as matching their biological sex and different from their actual gender identity.

Erica L. Green et al., writing for the New York Times, said:

"The Trump administration is considering narrowly defining gender as a biological, immutable condition determined by genitalia at birth, the most drastic move yet in a government wide effort to roll back recognition and protections of transgender people under federal civil rights law."

Before President Trump's inauguration, President Obama's administration had modified Title IX: part of the federal Education Amendments of 1972. It bans gender discrimination in education and health care programs that receive government financial assistance. Green wrote:

"A series of decisions [affecting the Title IX by the Obama administration] loosened the legal concept of gender in federal programs, including in education and health care, recognizing gender largely as an individual’s choice and not determined by the sex assigned at birth. The policy prompted fights over bathrooms, dormitories, single-sex programs and other arenas where gender was once seen as a simple concept. Conservatives, especially evangelical Christians, were incensed."

A Trump Administration memo circulating since last spring says, in part:

"Sex means a person’s status as male or female based on immutable biological traits identifiable by or before birth. The sex listed on a person’s birth certificate, as originally issued, shall constitute definitive proof of a person’s sex unless rebutted by reliable genetic evidence."

"Genetic evidence" presumably refers to an laboratory analysis of a person's DNA. A person's DNA contains sex chromosomes inherited from their father which may be type "X" or "Y." The presence of a "Y" chromosome indicates a male biological sex; its absence indicates a female biological sex.

Catherine E. Lhamon, who led the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights in the Obama administration has said:

"This takes a position that what the medical community understands about their patients -- [and] what people understand about themselves -- is irrelevant because the government disagrees."

She said that the proposed definition:

"... quite simply negates the humanity of people. 2

Sarah Warbelow, the legal director of the Human Rights Campaign, said:

"Transgender people are frightened. At every step where the administration has had the choice, they’ve opted to turn their back on transgender people." 2

Harper Jean Tobin, the policy director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, referred to the memo wording as:

"... an extremely aggressive legal position that is inconsistent with dozens of federal court decisions."

A coalition of civil rights groups has sent a memo to the Trump administration, saying:

"The overwhelming majority of courts to address the question since the most relevant Supreme Court precedent in 1998 have held that antitransgender bias constitutes sex discrimination under federal laws like Title IX." 2

Over a dozen activist LGBT leaders met at a news conference to discuss the circulating rumors. Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Rights said:

"I feel very threatened, but I am absolutely resolute. We will stand up and be resilient, and we will be here long after this administration is in the trash heap."

A rally was held outside the White House. Many demonstrators held up signs reading "#Won’tBeErased."

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

2018-OCT-24: The Department of of Justice delivers brief to the U.S. Supreme Court:

Previously, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission had sued on behalf of Aimee Stephens, a transgender employee. She had been fired from her job at a funeral home in Michigan when she said that she was transitioning, apparently from male to female. Her supervisor allegedly said that he would be "violating God's commands" if he let her continue to work for the home as a transgender person. The case is R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v EEOC & Aimee Stephens. Stephens's case is based on the claim that the home has violated federal employment laws regarding gender. She won at the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals who ruled that her case involved sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court concluded that transgender discrimination is necessarily sex discrimination, since firing a person for transitioning is firing them for not following gender stereotypes. The funeral home has appealed the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Solicitor General Noel Francisco of the federal Justice Department filed a brief in the case. He argued that federal civil rights law does not protect transgender employees. Aimee was identified at birth as male. Further, under recently adopted rules by the Trump Administration, a person's gender is permanently defined by the genitals that they had at birth. Thus, she is considered a male from birth to the present time. Since she was not fired for being male, then sex discrimination is not a valid claim. 3 Francisco wrote:

"The [Sixth Circuit] Court of Appeals misread the statute and this Court’s decisions in concluding that Title VII encompasses discrimination on the basis of gender identity."

horizontal rule

2018-NOV-01: Negative reactions to President Trump's plan to eliminate federal government recognition of transgender persons:

  • Fourteen community organizations that promote LGBT equality joined together to collect negative reactions from more than 50 major companies to President Trumps decision to define transgender persons out of existence. The company's total revenue exceeds 2.4 trillion dollars. They jointly signed a joint statement that says:

    "Business Statement for Transgender Equality:
    We, the undersigned businesses, stand with the millions of people in America who identify as transgender, gender non-binary, or intersex, and call for all such people to be treated with the respect and dignity everyone deserves.

    We oppose any administrative and legislative efforts to erase transgender protections through reinterpretation of existing laws and regulations. We also fundamentally oppose any policy or regulation that violates the privacy rights of those that identify as transgender, gender non-binary, or intersex.

    In the last two decades, dozens of federal courts have affirmed the rights and identities of transgender people. Cognizant of growing medical and scientific consensus, courts have recognized that policies that force people into a binary gender definition determined by birth anatomy fail to reflect the complex realities of gender identity and human biology.

    Recognizing that diversity and inclusion are good for business, and that discrimination imposes enormous productivity costs (and exerts undue burdens), hundreds of companies, including the undersigned, have continued to expand inclusion for transgender people across corporate America. Currently more than 80 percent of the Fortune 500 have clear gender identity protections; two-thirds have transgender-inclusive healthcare coverage; hundreds have LGBTQ+ and Allies business resource groups and internal training efforts.

    Transgender people are our beloved family members and friends, and our valued team members. What harms transgender people harms our companies.

    We call for respect and transparency in policy-making, and for equality under the law for transgender people." 4

  • More than 50 major companies including Adobe, Airbnb, Amazon, American Airlines, Apple, Bank of America, Ben & Jerrys, Cisco, Coca Cola, Corning, Dow, E. I. du Pont, Facebook, Google, IBM, Intel, Intuiy, J.P. Morgan, Levi Strauss, Marriott, MGM Resorts, Microsoft, Nike, Pepsi, Royal Bank of Canada, Twitter, Uber, etc. have all issued rebukes to the Trump administration’s planned assault on transgender rights.

  • Rea Carey, Executive Director of the National LGBTQ Task Force, said:

    "Today businesses joined the chorus of voices in saying, trans people will not be erased. Not today -– not ever. The push for transgender equity and equality has stretched beyond us as advocates. It’s manifesting in the opinions and actions of ordinary, everyday people. And increasingly more and more business leaders are embracing a culture of inclusion and respect for trans and gender-nonconforming people. We thank those who’ve endorsed today’s Trans Equality Statement and urge other corporations to swiftly get on board."

  • Elizabeth Wood, Chief Human Resources Officer of Levi Strauss & Co., said:

    "Equality is not a right for some, but for all. Executive actions and laws that allow discrimination erode our ability to foster vibrant, competitive workforces, which halts growth, creativity, and innovation. Our workplaces and communities must be diverse and welcoming for all people, regardless of race, sex, national origin, ethnicity, religion, age, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity." 4,5

  • Pro-transgender protests erupted across the nation.

horizontal rule

This topic continues in the next essay

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. Mythili Sampathkumar, "Trump administration considers elimination of transgender recognition," The Independent, 2018-OCT-21, at:
  2. Erica Green, et al., " 'Transgender' Could Be Defined Out of Existence Under Trump Administration," New York Times, 2018-OCT-21, at:
  3. Emily C. Singer, "Justice Department argues businesses can legally discriminate against transgender employees," Mic Network, 2018-OCT-25, at:
  4. "56 Major Companies Respond to Alarming Effort to Erase Transgender People From Legal Protections," National LGBTQ Task Force, 2018, at:
  5. Lauren Feiner, "Apple, Amazon, Facebook and more than 50 other companies sign letter against Trump administration's proposed gender definition changes," CNBC, 2018-NOV-01, at:
line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link


How you may have arrived here:

 Home > Transgender persons > here

 Home > "Hot" topics > Transgender persons > here

 Home > Christianity > Christian history, belief... > Beliefs > Transgender persons > here

Home > Christianity > History, practices... > Christian practices > Transgender persons > here

Home > Religious Information > Basic data > Transgender persons > here

Home > Human rights > Transgender persons > here

Home > Morality and ethics > Transgender persons > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
B.A. Robinson
Originally posted on: 2018-OCT-23
Latest update: 2019-JAN-18
line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

Go to the previous page, or go to the "Transgender" menu, or choose:


Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Hot, controversial topics

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

Sponsored links