Twitter icon


Facebook icon

ABOUT THIS SITE
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
Christian def'n
Climate Change
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret the Bible
 Persons
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
 Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment/climate

Same-sex marriage

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in the military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

 

 

Religious Tolerance logo

We really need your help through monetary donations, either a single donation or small monthly donations. Thank you.


 

2019-JAN:
President Trump's Ban on many
Transgender persons in the U.S. military:

A U.S. Court of Appeals rules in favor
of President Trump's Ban (the Mattis Plan).

(Preliminary information)

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

During 2018, a federal District Court judge in Washington DC blocked President Trump's ban on transgender military members because it was seen as violating the constitutional rights of service members. The case is called "Doe v. Mattis."

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard arguments in the case on 2018-DEC-10. On DEC-28, the court ruled against the lower court's decision, stating that its injunction was based upon:

"... an erroneous finding that the [2018] Mattis Plan was the equivalent of [the earlier] blanket ban on transgender service. ... Although the Mattis Plan continues to bar many transgender persons from joining or serving in the military, the record indicates that the Plan allows some transgender persons barred under the military’s standards prior to the Carter Policy to join and serve in the military."

The earlier plan banned all transgender persons from the military. The revised Mattis Plan only bans those transgender persons who suffer from Gender Dysphoria (GD). Before the year 2013, this was called "Gender Identity Disorder." It involves feelings of anxiety and distress related to one's assigned gender or sex. It can take the form of eating disorders, attempted suicide, depression, anxiety, and social isolation. All transgender individuals experience a mismatch between their biological gender -- typically as it was diagnosed at birth -- and their current gender identity. However, only some transgender individuals experience BG because only some feel distress because of it. 1 The Mattis plan allows those transgender service personnel who do not currently exhibit distress to join the military.

However, the ruling has little impact because:

  • The Appeals Court determined that their "decision is not a final determination on the merits." Thus, the district court case will continue.

  • Other federal courts have also found the ban to be unconstitutional.

And so, multiple cases are headed towards the U.S. Supreme Court.

Leaders in two national LGBT groups responded negatively to the Court of Appeal's ruling:

  • Shannon Minter, the legal director of The National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR), described the ruling as:

    "A devastating slap in the face to transgender service members who have proved their fitness to serve and their dedication to this country. ... We will keep fighting this cruel and irrational policy, which serves no purpose other than to weaken the military and punish transgender service members for their patriotism and service."

  • Jennifer Levi, the director of the Transgender Rights Project in GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) described the court decision -- which is based on an:

    "... absurd idea that forces transgender people to suppress who they are in order to serve -- is not a ban. ... It ignores the reality of transgender people’s lives, with devastating consequences, and rests on a complete failure to understand who transgender people are. It is also destabilizing to the military to so dramatically reverse a policy that has been in place for over two years, that senior military officials acknowledge has operated with no problems." 2

  • Marty Lederman, writing for Just Security, said:

    "Although the Mattis Plan continues to bar many transgender persons from joining or serving in the military, the record indicates that the Plan allows some transgender persons barred under the military’s standards prior to the Carter Policy to join and serve in the military." 3

As of 2019-JAN-13, the U.S. Supreme Court has not yet decided to accept or deny appeals in this matter. They are expected to respond in the near future. The High Court also has not acted on other criticial human rights cases involving guns, DACA, abortion access, or Title VII in the

GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) is a U.S. national non-profit legal rights organization. They advocate an end to discrimination based on sexual orientation, HIV status, and gender identity and expression. They have joined with the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR) to create a pledge to "stop the Trump-Pence transgender military ban." 4,5

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

This topic is currently active in the courts.
This essay will be augmented as new developments occur.

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. "Gender dysphoria," Wikipedia, as on 2019-JAN-10, at: https://en.wikipedia.org/
  2. Anon, "US Court rules in favour of Trump policy on military transgender ban," Army Technology, 2019-JAN-09, at: https://www.army-technology.com/news/us-court-trump-military-transgender-ban/
  3. Marty Lederman, "Untangling the Issues in the “Transgender in the Military” Litigation," Just Security, 2019-JAN-01. at: https://www.justsecurity.org/
  4. "Sign the pledge to stop the Trump-Pence trans military ban," GLAD/NCLR, 2019, at: https://notransmilitaryban.org/

horizontal rule

How you may have arrived here:

 Home > Transgender persons > here

 Home > "Hot" topics > Transgender persons > here

 Home > Christianity > Christian history, belief... > Beliefs > Transgender persons > here

Home > Christianity > History, practices... > Christian practices > Transgender persons > here

Home > Religious Information > Basic data > Transgender persons > here

Home > Human rights > Transgender persons > here

Home > Morality and ethics > Transgender persons > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Author:
B.A. Robinson
Originally posted on: 2019-JAN-13

Go to the previous page, or go to the "Transgender" menu, or choose:

line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

Go to the previous page, or go to the "" menu, or choose:

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Hot, controversial topics

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?


Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

 
Sponsored links