Twitter icon

Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
 Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret Bible
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions


About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Confusing terms
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs Religion
More information

Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
10 commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Death penalty

Same-sex marriage

Human rights
Gays in the military
Sex & gender
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news



Religious Tolerance logo

Christian scriptures


Are verses missing from the Gospel of Mark?

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.
horizontal rule

The Gospels of Mark:

Many ancient versions of Mark, written in the original Greek, have survived to the present day . No two agree perfectly in their wording. Usually, the differences are trivial and do not impact our understanding of Jesus' personality , messages, and ministry. However, some do. For example, consider Mark 1:41 -- the passage where a leper approached Jesus begging to be healed. Some of the earliest manuscripts say that Jesus became angry or indignant at the leper's intrusion. Later copies indicate that Jesus showed compassion or pity to the leper. Usually, Bible translators consider the earliest manuscripts to be the most accurate, because they are less removed from the original autographs. Thus, there was less opportunity for copyists to alter the original text. But in many cases, like the King James Version, the New International Version, and many others, 1 the translators followed the later, apparently incorrect, manuscripts, and describe Jesus as reacting with compassion and pity, rather than with indignation and anger.

Theologian Morton Smith discovered a copy of an ancient letter in a monastery near Jerusalem in the 1940s. The original letter was apparently written by Clement of Alexandria (circa 150-213 CE).  It referred to three versions of the Gospel of Mark circulating during the second century CE:

bulletA full version "....for those who are advancing with respect to knowledge," and
bulletA shorter version for the common believers who were new to Christianity.
bulletA forgery based on the full version which was circulated by a Christian group in the second century.

The shorter version is like the text of the Gospel that we now have in the Bible.  The full version is often referred to as the "Secret Gospel of Mark: " Two of the fragments which were quoted in the letter  from the full version of Mark are quite controversial . One refers to Jesus spending the night with a near-naked man. Another passage refers to "the young man whom Jesus loved."

Most conservative Protestant theologians believe that Clement's letter is a forgery, perhaps because of its homoerotic overtones. Most Clementine scholars believe that the letter was written by Clement.

horizontal rule

Topics covered in this section:

bullet The content of the Secret Gospel of Mark
bullet How Clement's letter was found and studied
bulletWhat happened to Clement's letter?
bulletMorton Smith's interpretation of Secret Mark
bullet Beliefs of conservative Protestant theologians

horizontal rule

References used:

  1. The Living Bible, Revised English Bible, New English Bible, and Annotated Scholars Version use the phrases "sternly," "anger," "in warm indignation" and "indignant." The Amplified Bible, Contemporary English Version, English Standard Version, James Moffatt Translation, Jerusalem Bible, King James Version, Living Bible, New American Bible, New American Standard Bible, New Century Version, New Living Translation, New Revised Standard Version, New World Translation, Phillips Modern English, Revised Standard Version, Rheims New Testament, Today's English Version, and Young's Literal Translation all use terms like " pity, " and " compassion. " To their credit, the New Living Translation includes a footnote indicating that some early manuscripts state that Jesus was angry.

  2. Charles W. Hedrick, "An Amazing Discovery," Biblical Archaeology Review, 2009-NOV/DEC issue, at:

horizontal rule

Key resources:

bulletAn extensive index to Internet articles and other resources on Secret Mark is at:
bulletMorton Smith, "The letter of Clement of Alexandria to Theodore; Transcription of the Greek text," at: This includes the Greek text and Smith's photos of the letter.
bulletYuri Kuchinsky, "Why it is impossible that Morton Smith could have forged Clement's letter
& the SecMk fragment." at:

horizontal rule

Site navigation:

 Home page > Christianity > Bible > Christian scriptures > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2002 to 2009 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Latest update: 2009-NOV-30
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or return to the Christian Scriptures, or choose:


Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.



Sponsored link: