About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
 Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handle change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret Bible
 Beliefs, creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions


About all religions
Main topics
Basic info.
Handling change
Confusing terms
World's end
True religion?
Seasonal events
More info.

Absolute truth

Attaining peace
Relig. tolerance
Relig. freedom
Relig. hatred
Relig. conflict
Relig. violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
10 command.
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Death penalty
Gay marriage
Human rights
Sex & gender
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news



Religious Tolerance logo

Same-sex marriage (SSM) in Washington, DC

Out-of-state SSMs recognized in DC.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

Bill not vetoed by Congress:

Mayor Fenty authorized the District of Columbia City Council's "JAMA" bill to recognize legal SSMs performed outside the District.

The measure then went to the House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee in Congress for a legislative review. The subcommittee has the power to vote on and veto the resolution. It would have been an interesting sight to see Congress debating and voting directly on same-sex marriage, even if it only applied to the residents of the District of Columbia.

Congress had 30 days to either veto the resolution or allow it to automatically take effect as it was passed by the Council. 1

Representative Jason Cahffetx (R-UT) has stated that he would attempt to have the resolution vetoed. He is the ranking Republican in the subcommittee that reviews District of Columbia's laws. He said: "Some things are worth fighting for, and this is one of them." 2

However, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Speaker of the House, said that there would be no vote to overturn the city council's resolution. She said: "I don't think the Congress should intervene there in terms of their recognition of marriages in the states that allow them." 2

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) has introduced bill HR 2608 which would veto the city council's decision. He said: "

"We don't think it's appropriate for the council in our nation's capital to redefine the institution that is the cornerstone of families. ... Every time this issue has gone to the people the people have said marriage should be what marriage has always been." 3

The general consensus of civil liberties groups, liberal and progressive faith groups, and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual (LGBT) organizations is that marriage is a fundamental right for loving committed couples, and that to deny same-sex couples the right to marry is discrimination based on gender and sexual orientation.

horizontal rule

Valid out-of-state same-sex marriages recognized:

The 30-day review period expired without Congress taking any action. As a result, all legal out-of-state marriages became recognized in DC, whether by same-sex or opposite-sex couples at midnight on the morning of 2009-JUL-07. As usual, same-sex couples obtained the district's benefits that had previously been restricted to opposite-sex married couples. However, the approximately 1,050 federal benefits given automatically to opposite-sex married couples continue to be denied same-sex couples because of the federal DOMA law.

Also, for the first time, same-sex married couples who have resided in DC can now obtain a divorce there. Previously, they had to leave the state to get a divorce.

The Washington Times reported:

"The law will affect everything from tax filing, employer health care benefits, inheritance and hospital visitation rights to mundane activities, such as gym memberships and car rentals. ..."

"The D.C. Office of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Affairs is working to release tip sheets and fact sheets. D.C. Attorney General Peter J. Nickles has requested that all government agencies review their policies so that implementation can proceed as smoothly and timely as possible, a spokeswoman for Mayor Adrian M. Fenty said." 5

horizontal rule

The story continues

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. Abby Goodnough & Katie Zezima, "Gay Marriage Advances in Maine," The New York Times, 2009-MAY-05, at:  http://www.nytimes.com/
  2. "D.C. council votes for same-sex marriages," Baptist Press, 2009-MAY-07, at: http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/
  3. "Federal Legislation Introduced to Protect Marriage in D.C.," CitizenLink, 2009-MAY-22, at: http://www.citizenlink.org/
  4. Jennifer Vanasco, "Out-of-state gay marriages now recognized in D.C.," 365gay.com, 2009-JUL-07, at: http://www.365gay.com/
  5. Melissa Giaimo, "Married gays see progress in D.C. Law affects taxes, rights for couples wed elsewhere," Washington Times, 2009-JUL-07, at: http://www.washingtontimes.com/

horizontal rule

Site navigation:

Home page > "Hot" topics > Homosexuality > Couples > SSM > Washington DC > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2009 & 2010by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
First posting: 2009-APR-10
Latest update: 2010-JAN-18
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or go to the Washington DC SSM menu or choose:

Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.


Sponsored link: