We really need your help through monetary donations, either a single donation or small monthly donations. Thank you.


2018-APR to 2019-JAN:
Transgender Persons in Military:

Medical groups criticize the ban.
CNN celebrates Father's Day.
Billboard battle in California.
Anti-Trump Light Show.
Trump loses at District Court
level, asks to bypass Courts of
Appeal and go directly to the
U.S. Supreme Court.
High Court activates ban.

Image by Maiconfz. Downloaded from Pixabay. CC0 Creative Commons

horizontal rule

Part 10

horizontal rule
Sponsored link

2018-APR-04: Various national medical groups criticize the transgender ban:

Dr. James L. Madera, CEO of the American Medical Association (AMA) sent a letter to Defense Secretary James Mattis, stating:

"We believe there is no medically valid reason — including a diagnosis of gender dysphoria — to exclude transgender individuals from military service. Transgender individuals have served, and continue to serve, our country with honor, and we believe they should be allowed to continue doing so." 1

Arthur C. Evans Jr., PhD, of the American Psychological Association, which has a membership of over 115,000 professionals, sent a letter stating:

"The American Psychological Association is alarmed by the administration’s misuse of psychological science to stigmatize transgender Americans and justify limiting their ability to serve in uniform and access medically necessary health care.

Substantial psychological research shows that gender dysphoria is a treatable condition, and does not, by itself, limit the ability of individuals to function well and excel in their work, including in military service. The science is clear that individuals who are adequately treated for gender dysphoria should not be considered mentally unstable. Additionally, the incidence of gender dysphoria is extremely low.

No scientific evidence has shown that allowing transgender people to serve in the armed forces has an adverse impact on readiness or unit cohesion. What research does show is that discrimination and stigma undermine morale and readiness by creating a significant source of stress for sexual minorities that can harm their health and well-being.

APA’s governing Council of Representatives adopted a resolution in 2008 supporting full equality for transgender and gender-variant people and calling for legal and social recognition of transgender individuals. ..." 2

Back in mid-2017, President-Elect Altha Stewart, M.D. announced the opposition of the American Psychiatric Association, to the banning of transgender persons from the military. The announcement read, in part:

"The APA stands firmly against discrimination against anyone. ... Banning transgender service members from serving our country harms not just those transgender Americans who have dedicated themselves to service of others, but it unfairly casts a pall over all transgender Americans. Discrimination has a negative impact on the mental health of those targeted.”

The APA in 2012 passed a policy statement that opposed discrimination against transgender people and called for their civil rights to be protected. Transgender people do not have a mental disorder; thus, they suffer no impairment whatsoever in their judgment or ability to work.

'Our stand in support of transgender military members is rooted in our policies against discrimination in all forms,' said APA CEO and Medical Director Saul Levin, M.D., M.P.A.'We firmly believe the world should be more inclusive. We are encouraged by Joints Chiefs of Staff Chairman Joseph Dunford’s statement that there are no modifications to the current policy and we call upon Defense Secretary Mattis to allow transgender service members to continue to serve in the military." 3

horizontal rule

2018-JUN-15: CNN features a FTM transgender person for Father's Day:

Sabastion Sparks, a transgender man who was identified as female at birth, is married to Angel Sparks, a transgender woman who was identified as male at birth. Both temporarily suspended their hormone treatments in order that Sabastion could get pregnant. He later gave birth to their son, Jaxen. A CNN tweet featured Sabastion in their Father's Day article with the sub-title: "He gave birth. He breastfed, Now he wasts his son to see him as a man."

Some conservatives responded negatively:

  • Ben Shapiro tweeted: “And I want my son to see me as a flying superhero who is faster than a speeding bullet and can leap tall buildings in a single bound. But that’s bulls**** too, so he won’t."

  • Matt Walsh tweeted: “This is the literal definition of fake news. Just do me a favor and never, ever lecture about science if you think 'he gave birth' is a sentence that makes sense."

  • Jesse Kelly, writing for the Federalist said: "All Democrats have to do is not be insane. And they can’t do it."

The core problem causing the conservative-liberal/medical conflict over transgender persons is that a man's gender can be defined in three ways:

  • by the appearance of their genital "parts;"

  • by internal brain structures which typically come in male or female sizes and neuron densities, and

  • by the presence of a Y sex chromosome in their DNA.

This works well for over 99% of humans because all three indicators are in harmony. However, transsexuals like Sebastion typically have female genital parts, XX (female) sex chromosomes in their DNA, and male internal brain structures that cause his fixed belief that he is a male. So, he became pregnant, delivered and breastfed a child, identifies himself as male, and wants his son to treat him as a man. Since many conservatives consider that a person's genital parts completely define their sex (except for intersexual persons whose, DNA can be tested to confirm their sex) they consider Sebastion to be a female. Sebastion himself and most liberals consider him to be male.

There is no obvious method to resolve this conflict, unless conservatives adopt the scientific/medical concepts of gender. Since there is no noticable dialog on this matter at the present time, tthis change may take a few decades. In the meantime, the high (over 40%) attempted suicide rate of transgender persons, which is partly caused by a lack of acceptance of transgender persons, will probably remain very high for a long time. Pity.

horizontal rule

2018-NOV: Battle of the billboards in California:

A billboard outside of Joshua Tree, CA, before the midterm elections, read:

"Ask Paul Cook why he voted to allow our military funds to be used for sex-change surgeries!"

"Paid for by Tim Donnelly for Congress"

Rep. Paul Cook (R-Yucca Valley) has been a U.S. Representative for the 8th congressional district in Eastern California since 2013. During 2017, he voted against an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act that would have banned payment by the military of health care costs related to gender transitions by transgender persons.

The midterm elections in 2018 pitted Cook and Donnelly -- two Republicans -- against each other. It was the only race with two Republicans on the ticket.

Timothy Michael Donnelly (R) was a member of the California State Assembly, representing the 59th and 33rd districts.

Some residents in San Bernardino County, CA, were offended by Donnelly's billboard, and decided to finance one of their own. It said:


The group said:

"The way we see it, Donnelly’s billboard was an act of hate, targeting our transgender neighbors. ... Our focus is making sure that our trans neighbors know that they are supported, appreciated, and celebrated in our community. ... Our billboard is an act of love."

Cook won the election with 41% of the vote; Donnelly lost with 23%. 4

horizontal rule

2018-NOV-19: Transgender group gave President Trump their message in a direct way:

During Transgender Awareness Week, the National Center for Transgender Equality projected a series of messages on the front wall of one of his hotels. One message read: "Transgender People #WontBeErased." It was projected above the front door of Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C.

Mara Keisling, the NCTE's executive director, said:

"So we’re here today to make a statement about visibility. A statement to let anybody know that when they attack us, we fight back. Every time. Every time they attack us, we get stronger, they get weaker. We will always fight back, and we will always win."

Later postings on the hotel facade were: "“Transgender Immigrants #WontBeErased," and "Transgender People of Color #WontBeErased."

She also said:

"We have always known our strongest tool in the fight against prejudice is the diversity and visibility of transgender people across the country, who will never be erased by this or any administration. As we end Transgender Awareness Week, we knew we needed to show that diversity where this President cannot ignore it. After all, he does not just attack us as transgender people. He also attacks us as immigrants, as students, as people of color, as survivors of sexual violence, and as members of the Armed Forces.

We are determined to push against each one of these assaults on our rights and defend our right to live as transgender people and every identity we carry with us." 5

horizontal rule

2018-NOV-23: President Trump asked the High Court to bypass Federal Courts of Appeals on Military Transgender cases:

President Trump's bans on transgender persons enlisting in the Armed Forces has been challenged in multiple Federal Trial Courts. It has been found to be unconstitutional by two judges:

  • Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Her decision has been appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2018-DEC.

  • Former Senior Judge Marvin Garbis, of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland who retired in mid-2018.

It has also been found unconstitional at a District Court in California and has been appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A hearing was held by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, but the judges have not yet issued their ruling. 6 The administration has suffered three losses and zero wins.

The usual next step would be for the Trump Administration to wait for the decision by one or more Courts of Appeals. That decision could then be appealed by the loser to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has the option of accepting or rejecting the appeal. However, the Administration appears to consider the matter so seriously and urgent that they have taken the unusual step of asking the U.S. Supreme Court to bypass the Court(s) of Appeal and take up the case immediately. In order to obtain a ruling by the middle of 2019, the High Court would probably have to hold hearings on the case in 2018-DEC. 7 Bypassing a Court of Appeal is an unusual step, but sometimes is taken in cases of extreme emergency.

horizontal rule

2019-JAN-22: U.S. Supreme Court delivers a potentially devastating blow to transgender members of the military:

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that they will not accept any of the appeals that challenge the Trump Administration's ban on transgender troops. Further, they will allow the Administration's plan to be implemented. Sarah McBride of the Human Rights Campaign sent a circular email to its mailing list stating:

"Simply put: The administration can now begin kicking transgender troops out of the military and denying trans people the opportunity to enlist … even as lawsuits like ours continue to play out."

Lambda Legal counsel Peter Renn, said:

"The Supreme Court’s decisions today are perplexing to say the least: on the one hand denying the Trump administration’s premature request for review of lower court rulings before appellate courts have ruled and rebuffing the administration’s attempt to skirt established rules; and yet on the other allowing the administration to begin to discriminate, at least for now, as the litigation plays out." 7

horizontal rule

Previous articles in this series on transgender persons in the U.S. military:

Part 1: 2011/2012: Overview. Support. Current military policies. Care for veterans.

Part 2: 2016: Previous ends to discrimination by the military. Pentagon announces an end to discrimination against transgender members. Negative reactions.

Part 3: 2016: More negative reactions to the ending of discrimination. Positive reactions.

Part 4: 2016: President Trump's ban on transgender persons in the military.

Part 5: 2017: Trump bans transgender military service members via tweets. Federal court blocks the move.

Part 6: 2017-JUL/AUG: Impact on Trump's Ban of Transgender Military Service members. Public opinion polls. Court cases.

Part 7: 2017-AUG: Trump's restores Ban of Military Transgender Persons. Lawsuits filed. Gen. Mattis responds. Extra Cost of Transgender Members.

Part 8: 2017-OCT to DEC: Two Court injuctions against Pres. Trump's Transgender ban. Enlistees able to apply, in theory.

Part 9: 2018-JAN/MAR: Transgender Persons in Military: Transgender Enlistees Apply. Pres. Trump Modifies Transgender ban.

Part 10: 2018-APR to 2019-JAN: Medical groups criticize the ban. CNN celebrates Father's Day. Billboard battle in California. Anti-Trump Light Show. Trump loses at District Court
level, asks to bypass Courts of Appeal and go directly to the U.S. Supreme Court. High Court activates ban.

horizontal rule



A helpful list:

The Toronto Star has a list of false claims made by President Trump. At the end of his first six months in office, the list totals 447 false claims. They average 2.4 per day. At this rate he will accumulate over 3,500 false claims by the end of his first term in office. Daniel Dale, writing for the Star, commented:

"... Trump has proven uniquely willing to lie, exaggerate and mislead. By all expert accounts, he is more frequently inaccurate than any of his predecessors." 9

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. Jana Pruet, "AMA claims there’s ‘no medically valid reason’ to exclude transgender people from military service," The Blaze, 2018-APR-04, at: https://www.theblaze.com/
  2. "APA Statement Regarding Transgender Individuals Serving in Military," American Psychological Association, 2018-MAR-26, at: http://www.apa.org/
  3. "APA Opposes Banning Transgender Service Members from Serving in Military," 2017-JUL-27, at: https://www.psychiatry.org/
  4. Alex Bollinger, "A Republican put up a hateful anti-trans billboard. So neighbors fought back with love," LGBTQ Nation, 2018-NOV-19, at: https://www.lgbtqnation.com/
  5. Alex Bollinger, "Trans activists projected a message to Donald Trump onto his DC hotel last night," LGBTQ Nation, 2018-NOV-20, at: https://www.lgbtqnation.com/
  6. William Vogeler, "Transgender Military Battle Continues as 9th Cir. Hears Arguments," Find Law, 2018-OCT-12, at: https://blogs.findlaw.com/
  7. Adam Liptak, "Trump Asks Supreme Court for Fast Appeal on Transgender Military Ban," New York Times, 2018-NOV-23, at: https://www.nytimes.com/
  8. Josh Jackman, "US Supreme Court allows Trump transgender military ban," Pink News, 2019-JAN-22, at: https://www.pinknews.co.uk/
  9. Daniel Dale, "Donald Trump just had his most dishonest week as president: 7 days, 34 false claims," Toronto Star, 2017-JUL-27, at: https://www.thestar.com/

horizontal rule

How you may have arrived here:

 Home > "Hot" topics > Transgender > here

 Home > Christianity > Christian history, belief... > Beliefs > Transgender > here

Home > Christianity > History, practices... > Christian practices > Transgender > here

Home > Religious Information > Basic data > Transgender > here

Home > Human rights > Transgender > here

Home > Morality and ethics > Transgender > here

Home > Religiously-motivated conflicts > Specific religious conflict event > Craziness of the 2016 election season

horizontal line

Copyright 2017 & 2018 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Latest update : 2018-JUN-17, Father's Day
Author: B.A. Robinson
line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

Go   to the previous page, or to the "transgender & transsexual menu, or "the craziness of the U.S. 2016 election season," or choose:

Web  ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Hot, controversial topics

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link


Popular Pages

More Info

Twitter icon

Facebook icon

About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Vital notes

World religions
Christian def'n
Climate Change
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
Interpret the Bible
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Confusing terms
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Death penalty

Same-sex marriage

Human rights
Gays in the military
Sex & gender
Stem cells
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news