Religious Tolerance logo



horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

Topics covered in this essay are:

bullet Laws about Naturism in the U.S. and Canada
bullet Efforts to restrict Naturism
bullet References

horizontal rule

Laws about Nudism:

United States

bullet Federal law: No federal US federal law that either allows or prohibits nudity. The courts have not ruled whether the right to engage in naturism is guaranteed by the Constitution under its freedom of expression provision. Thus, the legality of various forms of undress is currently left up to the individual states and localities to decide. Nudity is generally allowed in some areas of some national parks, unless local laws have overriding jurisdiction. 

In 1981 (Schad v. Borough of Mount Ephraim, 452 U.S. 61, 65-66), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on nudity, as it appears in movies, plays and TV. They found that: "Entertainment, as well as political and ideological speech, is protected; motion pictures, programs broadcast by radio and television, and live entertainment, such as musical and dramatic works, fall within the First Amendment guarantee ... Nor may an entertainment program be prohibited solely because it displays the nude human figure. 'Nudity alone' does not place otherwise protected material outside the mantle of the First Amendment." This might be interpreted as protecting a naturist's right to engage in a nude demonstration or public performance on a beach. But the ruling does not appear to cover simple nudism.

A photograph of nudists might be considered an innocent picture by some people, an erotic photo by others, and pornography by still others. U.S. law restricts, and in some cases criminalizes, child pornography. Included are books, magazines, periodicals, films, video tapes. Child pornography is carefully defined in federal law as "any visual depiction, if—
(A) the producing of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B) such visual depiction is of such conduct."
bullet State laws: In Alabama, a law is on the books which prohibits lobbying in behalf of nudism. It is clearly unconstitutional and could not withstand a court challenge. The law is not being enforced at this time.
bullet Local laws: A referendum in Newport, Maine, was conduced at the time of the 1998-NOV-3 elections. It would have asked selectmen in the city to ban the display of "female breasts ... visible from a public way." The proposal was defeated. The vote was triggered by complaints about a resident mowing her lawn while topless.

Canada: Two federal laws (Section 173 and 174 of the Criminal Code) apply across the country. 

bullet Section 173 prohibits "indecent acts" done either:
bullet in a public place, or
bullet in any place, if done with the intent to "insult or offend"

It also forbids "exposure of genital organs" for a "sexual purpose" to someone under the age of 14. As is common Canadian practice, Parliament leaves the exact definition of these terms up to courts to decide. Various Provincial courts have decided that:

bullet simple nude sunbathing is not indecent.
bullet streaking is not prohibited under the law.
bullet the inside of a car can be a public place if it is viewable from the street.
bullet the doorway of a home can be a public place.
bullet Section 174 prohibits being "so clad as to offend against public decency or order" while exposed to public view. Courts have decided that nude swimming is not within the range of this law. This section seems to have been used mainly against nude and semi-nude performances in commercial establishments.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

Efforts to restrict Naturism:

The Naturist Education Foundation wrote:

"Two years ago NEF produced a video, 'Baring the Threat', in which the threat of the radical religious right to Naturism was explored. At that time groups like the 'Christian Coalition,' 'American Family Association' and others were attempting to impose their morals on all North Americans by securing whatever government seats they could acquire...Although these radical groups have a broad agenda for controlling America's politics and morals, they are focusing attacks on what would seem to be a minor issue: mere nudity.

The Naturist Action Committee (NAC) stated:

"When the religious right failed to stir up enough community outrage over something as simple and familiar as skinny-dipping, they took a new tack -- radical extremists claimed that family Naturism is a form of child abuse. NAC has been tracking this trend in state legislatures and the courts for over six years now..." 1
As of 1997-FEB, the NAC was "actively lobbying against bills...[including] restrictions or outright bans on nudity in more than two dozen state legislatures throughout the United States...Our opposition...the radical well funded and well organized as a citizen lobby with the goal of putting a thousand such laws in place by the year 2000.

By the end of 1998, the Naturist Action Committee had identified legislation in 40 U.S. states, the Virgin Islands and Canada that would stop or impede nude recreation. 2

Some municipal, county, and state legislation limiting public nudity is aimed at controlling behavior in topless bars, XXX rated pornography, etc. However, unless carefully worded, it can limit the freedom of naturists to be nude in wilderness areas, in private nudist resorts and even in their own homes. A common approach among some state legislators is to introduce a bill to tackle what is perceived to be a social problem. Then they word the bill so inclusively as to criminalize naturist activities at private resorts, and topless beach wear, thong bathing suits, etc. In some cases, these bills would prohibit nudity even in the privacy of one's home. Since most legislators are lawyers and exhibit at least normal intelligence, it is apparent that such duplicity is intentional.

The Naturist Action Committee claims that its "success rate against proposed anti-nudity laws in U.S. state legislatures over the past three years exceeds 94%." 3 They list legislative successes in FL and TX during 1997; in KY & PA during 1998; in MA, MO, & NE during 1999; and in KS & WA so far during 2000.

horizontal rule


  1. The Naturist Action Committee (NAC) alerts interested persons to legislative threats against nudists. They are sponsored by the Pilgrim Naturalists of Boston. See: They have an archive of past alerts at:
  2. The Naturist Action Committee maintains a list of anti-naturist legislation in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Canada, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. See: 
  3. "Success Stories," at:
  4. "Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors," U.S. Code: Title 18, Part I, Chapter 110, Paragraph 2252. See:

horizontal rule

Copyright 1996 to 2005 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Latest update: 2005-AUG-18
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)

horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or go to the Naturism/Nudism menu, or choose:


Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

GooglePage Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

privacy policy