|
MenuReligious Freedom Restoration Acts (RFRAs) Sponsored link.
Overview:During the late 1980's, a series of rulings by the US Supreme Court upheld the right of governments to restrict religious freedom, as long as the limitations applied equally to all faiths. In response, a series of laws at the federal and state level were initiated, in an effort to limit such restrictions. They have all run into constitutional problems because they attempt to grant special religious freedoms to individuals and organizations that are not available to Agnostics, Atheists, and other secularists and their groups. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires that a wall of separation be maintained between church and state. Any law that gives special privileges to religious people and groups is clearly unconstitutional. These laws remain immensely popular among the general public and religious institutions and will probably continue to be introduced, passed, signed into law, and eventually declared unconstitutional. One solution might be to craft a law that would give the same special privileges to all groups and individuals who promote either a religions or a secular belief system. This law might be declared constitutional if it:
However such a law would probably be able to gather enough support to pass such legislation in Congress. Sponsored link:Topics covered in this essay:
A recommended book on the topic of religion and the law:
Copyright © 1998 to 2018 by Ontario Consultants
on Religious Tolerance |
| |
|
Marci A
Hamilton, "God vs. the Gavel: Religion and the rule of law" The author is
an expert on RFRA and RLUIPA. 
Page Translator: