We hope you enjoy this web site and what it represents.
If so, fantastic!
The thing is ... we're an independent group of normal people who donate our time to bring you the content on this website. We hope that it makes a difference.
Over the past year, expenses related to the site upkeep (from research to delivery) has increased ... while available funds to keep things afloat have decreased. We would love to continue bringing you the content, but we desperately need your help through monetary donations. Anything would help, from a one-off to small monthly donations.
$3? $5? $15? The option is yours. Regardless, your help would be appreciated.
Please click HERE to be taken to our donation page. Thank you so much.
Bruce Robinson, Founder.
Main biblical themes
The transferability of sin:
Punishing innocent people
for the sins of the guilty.
Conflicting biblical quotations:
Is scapegoating ethical?
Is sin -- and the punishment for sin -- transferable from the guilty to the innocent?
No, at least sin which requires the death penalty is not transferable:
"The fathers shall not be put to death for the
children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every
man shall be put to death for his own sin." 1
Yes, God can personally take an active role in transferring punishment among
generations from the guilty to the innocent:
"Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them (idols), nor
serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of
the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them
that hate me." 2
A skeptical quotation by Ahamed Deedat:
Original Sin: "Each and every one has this contamination according to the Christians....He, [God] blames you for something that you didn't do and he blesses you for what someone else did.". 3
That is: God
blames everyone for the sins of Adam and Eve, and blesses believers for the sacrifice of Jesus.
When a crime is committed, who should be held responsible? Should it be only
the person who committed the illegal act and that person's accomplices? If punishment is involved, should it
be restricted to the perpetrator? Or is it appropriate to apply a principle of
collective responsibility 4and
punish a group of people who have some connection to the perpetrator? -- perhaps
including that person's parents; their children; more distant relatives;
inhabitants of the same town; those of the same religion, tribe, nationality,
language, skin color, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, or some other factor. 5
Most legal, religious and ethical systems worldwide hold individuals responsible
for their own acts. A guilty person cannot transfer their responsibility for
having committed a criminal act to their children, parents, friends, or
strangers. When they do the crime, they are stuck with the time in jail.
However, if we assume that the Bible is inerrant and unambiguous,
the Hebrew Scriptures (a.k.a. Old Testament) and the Christian Scriptures
(a.k.a. New Testament) both teach a different message. They contain numerous descriptions of instances where a
transfer of responsibility from the guilty to the innocent took place -- some
under direct instruction by God.
As Tracy White wrote in her column "Daily Walk:"
"Four thousands years were required to teach the world through extensive pattern and unfolding design that sin must be atoned only by the shedding of innocent blood. ..." 6
Although this section of our web site describes many of the instances in the Bible where sin
transfer is described, It is important to remember that many liberal and mainline Jews and
Christians do not believe in the inerrancy of the
Bible. Some consider many biblical stories to be unrelated to real, historical
events. Some even feel that some events are against the will and intent of God, and merely reflect the pre-scientific tribal culture that was active when the books were written. Many suggest that such transfer of sin is immoral and that biblical passages promoting such transfers should be ignored along with other biblical events that are immoral by today's ethical standards.
The principle of transfer of sin from the guilty to the innocent also works for blessings. Acts 16 describes how Paul and Silas were convicted of causing a public disturbance and thrown into prison. The Phillipian jailer asked them: "
Acts 16":29-31: "... what must I do to be saved? They replied, 'Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved -- you and your household'." (NIV translation)
Thus, if the jailer believes the right things about Jesus, then he would be saved. The effects of his decision would then be transferred to his wife and children even though they may not have believed the same things about Jesus.
During 2015-NOV, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (a.k.a. the LDS Church, or the Mormon Church) changed their policies on the treatment of lesbians, gays, and bisexuals in same-gender relationships and marriages. The policy changes also directly affect the children of such couples. Some have criticized this polcy change as punishing the innocent for the "sins" of their parents. More details.
Deuteronomy 24:16 in the King James Version of the Bible.
Exodus 20:5 in the King James Version of the Bible. This is part of
one of the three copies of the Ten Commandments in the Hebrew Scriptures.