Note:One of our web site's policies is to avoid criticizing the religious beliefs of any individual or group. In this essay, the author recommend that certain passages from the Bible and other holy texts be edited to remove passages that promote or condone genocide; mass murder; human slavery; oppression of women; torturing prisoners; execution of homosexuals, religious minorities, children, and persons guilty of trivial offenses; etc. The essay is based on the belief that deeds are evil and immoral and can promote religious hatred, discrimination, and violence today. We realize that believers who regard their holy text as God's word might interpret this essay as an attack on their beliefs. However, with the world sliding so rapidly into religiously-motivated mass terror, we felt that we should bend the rules in this case. If you are easily distressed, we recommend that you not read this essay. Alternately, you may wish to submit your own rebuttal in the form of an essay for our visitors' essays section.
Sponsored link.
Discussion:We will primarily cite Christian examples here because it is the main religion in North America, which is our main service area. People's behaviors are greatly influenced by their beliefs. Thus, the elimination of religiously-motivated hatred, discrimination, intolerance, oppression, violence, terrorism, murder, genocide, etc. requires that we first have to replace our current beliefs with better ones. We will have to discard some of what we have been taught, and change some of our traditional patterns of thinking. Humanity cannot continue to resolve twenty-first century dilemmas with 1st or 7th century CE guidelines, much less guidelines that came during the 6th century BCE or earlier. Present and future generations must not be held hostage to beliefs and practices originating in an ancient parochial world organized in tribal groups. We need to deal with the problem of religiously-motivated hatred and oppression at its source, by introducing major changes into our "sacred texts." This will be extremely difficult to achieve. To break the spiral of violence and intolerance in the world, we need to eliminate the sanctification of wrong attitudes and evil deeds which are contained in our "sacred texts." Consider two modern-day examples inspired by the book of Joshua in the Hebrew Scriptures (a.k.a. Old Testament). You will recall that this book records numerous genocides committed by Joshua against the Canaanites.
Other examples from the Hebrew Scriptures that inspire oppression -- and worse -- include the condoning and regulation of human slavery, genocide, oppression of women, execution and oppression of homosexuals, transferring sin from the guilty to innocent persons, and many other activities that are considered profoundly immoral by most faiths today. Progress can be seriously impeded by the rigid attitudes of religious leaders against change. More flexibility will be needed, particularly with regard to the inerrancy, immutability, and universal applicability of sacred texts. Literalist and absolutist interpretations will have to be challenged before change will be possible. As humanity's intellectual and spiritual capacity grows, so does our ability to understand complex phenomena. Our imperfect ideas are gradually replaced by more adequate ones. Our judgments are not final and often need to be modified. These attitudes should extend also to our consideration of our Scriptures. Unfortunately, reason cannot tell us how to treat logical problems created by traditional religious doctrines that do not seem to make coherent sense in today's world, but which claim to present eternal truth. Trying to overcome intolerance by simply reinterpreting existing holy texts may well be insufficient. More basic changes may be needed. The Abrahamic religions -- Judaism, Christianity and Islam -- with which most of the Earth's population identify, will probably be very resistant to change. These faiths have no need to retain references to historical atrocities and immoral behaviors in their scriptures. However, there is little hope that they will be easily persuaded to effect changes to the text, such as removing those offensive commandments that serve no positive purpose. Still, retaining these commandments is dangerous, because some of the passages provide a ready-made pretext for many types of hatred and violence. Perhaps the most that can be hoped for in the near future is a change in attitude towards the existing scriptures. This was largely accomplished over a century ago with the biblical passages that recognized, condoned, and regulated slavery. They are largely ignored today. Hopefully, religious leaders will proactively teach that passages promoting genocide, oppression of women and sexual minorities, religious intolerance, etc. are devoid of value and must also be ignored.
Sponsored link:
Further comments on Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity & Islam):
The concept of progressive revelation:"Progressive revelation" is the concept that some instruction that was originally revealed for a particular age may be superseded by later revelations. These do not necessarily negate the earlier beliefs; they may simply bring them up to date. 5 This concept also contains the understanding that revelations that are considered still valid today, may well be superseded in the future as cultures change. Prominent among the faith groups that believe in progressive revelation are the Unitarians / Unitarian Universalists and the Baha'i's. Also, the Sikhs allow, in each generation, for a change in interpretation of their revelation by the Panth, the Sikh community.
This topic continues in the next essay.
References used:The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.
Copyright © 2006
by Vladimir Tomek
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links:
|
Canaan S. Banana, "The Case for a New Bible," in: Rasiah S. Sugirtharajah,
Ed., "Voices from the Margin," Orbis/SPCK, (2004). 
Mel Thompson, "Philosophy of Religion," Teach Yourself book series,
McGraw-Hill, (3rd edition, 2010). 
Page Translator:
